Alien Anomalies

It is true that witnesses and those experiencing abduction are "witch-hunted and flushed out into the open to be scorched by ridicule" because that is what the system does, some people have made a lot of money by writing about them, others have destroyed the lives of many good researchers and all in the name of national security.

This forum has evolved to become a platform for serious debate into the anomalies we find, we have always called for disclosure and supported those who endeavour to show the truth for what it is (not what we would like it to be), we have had our share of trolls, armchair critics, and even government shills, but none of them have been successful in discrediting the real evidence our members have posted.

I am very proud of what AA has become, but I feel all the credit must go to our members and not to me as it is your posts that visitors return to read each month, I have tried to keep freedom of speech and expression open in the site, but sadly some individuals take it upon themselves to create make believe worlds or artefacts which not only distracts the reader from the real anomalies, but also discredits the community as a whole.

I do believe the world is ready for disclosure, the evidence is leaking out of every crevice of the censors vaults, we have seen it with our own eyes and every year millions of people all around the planet discover the truth, but like water molecules scattered throughout the sky they have little impact on the world around us, it is only when the molecules join together can they create an impact, and likewise until all our communities unite together in our calls for the truth the doors of secrecy will remain tightly shut.

 

 

 

This post really highlights in a nutshell the reason I am so proud to be a part of this Forum. It is a true dialogue from many different perspectives discussing what we are finding and questioning what we are being expected to believe by those in power on our planet. It is so much more stimulating than one-liners n Facebook or a 'like' button that removes the need for interaction and debate on a more personal and in-depth level. We are many different seekers on this Forum from all corners of the globe and every imaginable cultural diversity, yet we find common ground here to express our interest over Mars and the other bodies in our Solar system. As a whole, we present well documented and researched anomalies and we open it up to discussion. We do not always agree, but we take the time and effort to chew the bone done to the marrow on many anomalies thats members find. We also take the time to really think about what we are finding and we often launch into debates such as this one where everyone has a say on the matter, it is contrsuctive on so many levels and I believ that as a whole we are slowly lifting the veil of secrecy and coming to our own conclusions as a group about what we have found. Xenon, I know you must be very proud that what you envisaged has finally come to pass, a true group united in the same goal.

I also believe that we have some of the most professional anomaly hunters and seekers on the net, that find an anomaly and then do not rest until they have found as much evidence as they can to support their find. Well done to those that take the effort to present as conclusively as possible. The net is full of one-liners and 15 second wonders where you post an image that could be something but you really couldn't be bothered to do the legwork to prove the point. Look, we are all lazy and it is hard work to do the research at times..so much easier just to post that one image, and that is your choice. It's al;so easier to look at the image, hit the like button or make some comment and never actually go and look at the source yourself to verify or see if you can expand on it. Here we are different and special in that regard, thank you everyone for making us that way !

Morbius,

What you say is true,  unlike those who wish to keep us all enslaved. This would be the best forum for your story or "History", as it is. You would find the least amount of "deaf ears" here.  There has to be a reason, and a very good reason to keep the blinders on mankind.  A very powerfull and motivating characteristic of humans in general is greed. Another is the fear of death, and I dont mean physical death. I mean the death of spirituality.  The idea that this is all there is, nothing more, no afterlife or alternate dimensional crossover or whatever.

I would like to hear your story and attempt to find a reason for all the lies, the millions of hours and dollars spent on nothing more than keeping us from the truth.  I somehow feel that this ties in with other events, on a global scale, going on right now.

ICEMAN wrote:

---

What is true about the planet Mars???

---

That my friend is the perfect question to ask.

We can see by the differing geology within the images we post do not correspond to what we are being told, there is no doubt Mars had flowing liquid water in the very recent past and not billions of years ago (surface clays prove it), and we have evidence that surface water and biological life is still present today along with technology and engineering we have not even dreamed of.

Being an anomalies hunter is not a hobby or a pastime, it is a way of life along which you discover that those who hide the truth are programmed to stop others finding it also, thankfully most anomaly hunters are intelligent folk who discover the truth even when it is hidden from us, because most of those who hide the truth do not know exactly what they are hiding (glitch in the systems programming) so they miss the obvious.

Some new anomaly hunters often rush in to their discoveries by associating anomalies from a human perspective resulting in everyday objects reflecting in the anomalies we discover, remember speculation is always a good thing providing you have the intelligence to use it, but without an understanding of what terrain or structure is surrounding the anomaly, speculation is a tool best left aside until one has studied fully, in the meantime we carry on learning from other hunters experiences.

One final point that needs to be made, is that the larger and more committed the community becomes the more chance we will have disclosure.

What is true about the planet Mars???

Like the way you think. Keep up the well worded and inspirational writings. They are always appreciated, thank you Morb and Xe!

qmantoo wrote:

---

Could it be that we already have our people there on location and they told the powers that be on Mars to let the rover(s) do their thing without hindrance? You think the Earth people can dictate what happens on Mars? Any alien species will be many moons ahead of us in the race as they have already colonised other planets and asteroids and we are time-wise, only just dipping our toe in the water.

---

 

     Maybe not on Mars, as the Martians look to be the inheritors of a devastated  planet and the remnant native population are eking out a rough existence.

     

 Unless NASA is hiding and obfuscating   scenes of  highly advanced functioning cities that be the envy of those on earth in grandeur.

But on the other hand   aliens not from Mars or from earth could have first dibs on the place and the natives are in no form or shape to fight them off.

 

 Or  earthlings are on Mars as guests of these alien higher beings that have come to earth and have taken us on a joy ride with them to Mars and other places in the solar system and it is not us doing the dictating to the beings on Mars.

 

 

 

 

    

Your welcome .. and right . For anyone wishing to grasp the magnitute and progress of our real space exploration and technology, a good place to start is from an old coasttocoast broadcast of Art Bell: Somewhere in Time/ Saturday January 9, 2010/ Guest: David Adair . In my opinion this is a most extrardinary show/interview and not to be missed. Once heard you will never be the same again when encountering views on our present technology and its deployment in offworld endeavors. /-M

Ken A .. hello , and sorry for the delay .. you'll find the pace here is not too rushed at times, although it may also appear in flurries too.

Thanks for the encouraging reply .. much appreciated it is. Ordinary people don't join AA ... these are of an entirely different order of intellect, to mesh with, and in degree, comprehend our choosen subject. These are a peculiar, driven, and a special people to me. One thing be ashured, you are among the finest anomalie researchers on the planet ... and yes, as you say, there is a lot to learn and talk about here .. so true .. welcome .

Your Rover point is a loaded question for shure. We had returned to Mars decades ago ( 65-67 ) with back-engineered tech. Our military and scientists have no serious opposition or conflict with the local governments, and are located in well established and entrenched bases and installations that are strategically placed in select areas of the planet's surface.

These provide guard-escort and service the Rover, thus it's otherwise impossible service life-span and pristine appearance are explained and accounted for. I had in fact submitted a post on this very subject and included a direct view, albeit somewhat obfuscated, of one of these very service-techs doing maintenance work on our Rover. The attached, an old study-set of 3, may .. or may not .. be of a revealing nature in unveiling the the truth of this matter. Hopefully, this has answered your question, a fair question deserving a reasonably thought out reply.

Again thanks .. and Welcome. Good Hunting and Posting Ken A . /  -Morbius

A compelling post Q, and hopefully this will be a fair and plausible reply to this subject.To begin, you believe there are other ' life-forms ' out there. That they could be ' inter-dimensional ' and ' of any size.' All well and good Q, as I too agree to this possibility. The following is my take on the substance and reality of an oft perplexing yet quite relevant subject. Firstly, you are right on the sightings of these strange, at times near apparition-like micro people and proportionate buildings, etc. I myself have reported 30-ft. tall Selenites or ' moon-people ' if you will. Moreso, and not reported, people who appear on and around the Great Wall of Iapetus. Seen climbing around, peering into the ruins, and on occassion just sitting around. These are about one-tenth upwards to one-quarter the height of .. the Wall. Yet, the Wall itself is an astonishing ( to us ) 60-miles high .. straight up. So it would seem I am ' seeing ' 10-15 and 20 mile high ' beings '! ( yeah, I can hear the sirens getting louder already ). Fact is , we have all, time and again, spotted and honestly reported these, although not quite understood or defined clearly, these phenomena -as so many members of our group can affirm.

What to make of them then? With no disrespect or bias to anyone, this is my view, and will begin with the following background. We have noted the many reliable reports of our military's capability to camouflage, in some new and mysterious manner, tanks, trucks, planes, even whole bases. I have heard the statements, reports and reviews by and from competent and well trained airmen, flyers and observers/crew on manoeuvres with special units. That wether on permanent or temporary assignments, had witnessed tanks and planes which had simply ' vanished .' That even flyers passing low over isolated patches of the sw desert, reported seeing a known base that, like the flick of a light-switch, suddenly dissappeared and looked like the surrounding desert floor. Personally, I feel that what they show us as ' the latest ' leading-edge tech .. is not. That the actual science and hardware is not 10-20 or even 50 .. but a hundred-years ahead of what is presented to us. Now, take an ' advanced-civilization ', a thousand, ten-thousand .. or more, years ahead, and have well mastered these arts and sciences, which could easily be understood by them and well perfected to a near unimaginable degree .. even to being considered ' magical.' Not only to cloak then, but to cover and change entire land areas ( a la Star Trek's 'holo-rooms') ..how about then .. an entire planet? With such science/technology .. and power, would this not appear near child's-play to such beings or entities ? So far so good I take it .. but lets torque the tension-factor up a notch. What if, just if, there were beings who needed no such instrumentalities of any kind, to acomplish this very same ' cloaking ', and generating the appearance of scenes and objects right down to virtual audio/visual and sensory perceptions .. of them .. on ' any size.'?!

I believe our vision of Mars, with some qualifications however, is basically an accurate one. There is the obvious layers and effects applied, that we have no control over, and have to contend with constantly. We then need be further cautious as to just what is left. Is it indeed a ' reality ' or illusional-projection of objects, of manipulated forms and areas. It is in this stage that we need be especially discerning in our call of the interpretational ' value ' of some such ' anomalies.' There is, or was, a particular post by which I hoped to demonstrate this, and perhaps some member/s may recall. It showed a vauge, mirage-like person or being, someone said it looked like a 'column of smoke'. There was much speculation on this scene. This scene is repeated time and again in various pics however, and I believe is of flesh and blood average earth-size personel and equipment of the present occupiers of Mars. They appear because they received a lighter application layer and this opacity level/ possibly done purposely?/ allows us to occassionally get a glimpse or bleed-through of the actual or ' real' scene present. I believe this then, is the real ' data ' and ' Standard ' .. as found in these lightly-treated but ghostly appearing personel, vehicles , tents and buildings. I consider it probable then, we are dealing with real people, many military, and some ' native ' people too. That they are a long time-line of people exported from earth. The more recent arrivals being the Germans near the end of WW II, and now the American Presence has asserted itself too.

Other ' life-forms ' then, ' multi-dimensional ' and ' of any size ' ... yes Q ... and all. This is beginnng to appear not only possible by inferrence, but the proverbial rule rather than the exeption. and what now appears clearly paramount here is to be cautious in discerning whether we are dealing with a reality or a projected representation in some of our anomalies, and in any event could we actually ' prove ' it either way?

A future and related post, will deal with the widely known 'Alien' reports, such as the ' greys', and such as Stitchin's 'Annunaki', and how they relate and tie-in to our studies here at AA. For now, I hope this submission may be of some insight, and, as the 'elongated-skulls' and such, serve as some referrence  to future forum debates on this admittedy puzzling and complex subject. I really hope you might consider this a fair appraisal Q, and as I, truly wonder what we are dealing with here at all? Cheers / -M

A poorly thought-out post Q. You're saying if we don't have the macho-image like you, we should 'go someplace else' ... that you have 'a pair' and can 'take it'( where?). This type of rhetoric reminds of TW's claim that he could 'hand Xenon his ass on a platter if he wanted to'. What kind of garbage is now in the Forum for all to read? Have you thought what visitors are making of this constant bickering and trash talk?Yes, I have thought of what visitors are thinking to themselves. They are thinking that all kinds of rubbish gets posted here without any effort to backup the claim of an anomaly.

There is no excuse for laziness in checking what you have posted is as real an anomaly as you can find. That checking comes with finding other images of the anomaly from different angles and different sun positions so that shadows are in different places.

If anyone does not like what I say, then it is probably because they dont want to play the game how it should be played. And, yes I do mean there is a duty of reasonable care in presenting your findings which each of us has to abide by. Otherwise this site becomes a laughing stock of the internet rather than a place where people have tried their best to show the truth behind the lies which we believe we are being told.

I do not need to justify my post since it is common sense to listen to others who are more experienced and then make up your own mind - bearing in mind that they possibly have been doing this for longer. If they have not, then it is just two experts having a difference of opinon which often happens.

Our cherished beliefs are just that - beliefs and even science holds onto its 'knowledge' until someone comes along and challenges it to look at another perspective. As we get older and more fixed in our ways, it is harder to see the other side of arguments which may need to be looked at in order to move forward with our life. I always try to challenge myself to look at other peoples viewpoints and try to reply in a respectful manner.

You dont have to get defensive Mobius, I present my opinion as you do yours and hopefully in the middle will be common ground where we can both work together.

I have given a lot of thought about the way the community has been structuring itself over the years, sometimes we spend so much time trying to argue what we see and know is right we forget that the other person is right too (But just on a different level), and in our haste we often forget our manners when communicating with a differing culture or circumstance, then go ahead and present our replies in a technical way forgetting that there are also emotion connected to the message that the recipient reads, those of you with intellect return to the site and post with dignity and pose, that and your evidence is why AA is so well respected and viewed by so many, it is up to each and every one of us to present our findings in which we see fit, but basic etiquette should always be in use throughout.

Many people will shoot the messenger in order to put spin on their own agenda, as for 'handing Xenon's ass on a platter if he wanted to', many people have tried, but I always insist the platter is stamped sterling silver, and I insist other members have that privilege too

 

This is not directed at anyone in particular - OK? It is a general opinion which you can agree with or reject as you wish.

The problem comes when people do not want to put more effort into finding other views of the selected feature. They just want to post one image and interpret that image as if it is the only one. Often it is not the only one and often there are other better views which would resolve a lot of arguments or avoid detrimental comments.

If one is a sensitive soul, and takes offence easily, then too bad. One will just have to get tougher, grow a pair, and put a little effort into more investigation. Others are not going to bad-mouth someone who has done their investigation and done some graft but they ARE likely to criticise someone who only posts one view and has not made efforts to find corroborating views fromn different perspectives. THATS what it boils down to.

Of course, I am as much to blame doing this as anyone else, but at least I can handle criticism of (in effect) my laziness and I am not a little flower who cannot be criticised. If the kitchen is too hot, go find another.

A post score would be one way, but there are people who think alike and 'see' the same things and would up the score.

So I think as long as you could both rate a post positively AND negatively  then this might work better than what we have now perhaps.

However, a post score has the same weight for each member - regardless of whether they have been anomaly-hunting for a few years or just started and have more to learn about the process. This is the problem we have here, is that someone like Skipper on this forum would get the same weighting as someone like you and me. That may not reflect the 'experience' factor in the post score.