I have reviewed 300 fotos of LRO 1965 and the triangular marks are repeated in 9 fotos in the same display. Are marks different to the image, but the semicirculars colonies have patterns which deffine constant distances among the domes, it look likes prefabricated units linked with tunnels or passages, The distribution of groups is arquitectural, evidence of a different rank or activity among groups of inhabitants, The economy of routes linking small colonies, the curves of linear domes is for bennefit of the same lavel curves of terrain, Then you see straights displays wich most be of a different time of erection. In the Tsiovkolskiy Crater there are the presence of many of these mining activities.. What kind of mineral is present?
This has to be something to do with the framerate and movement of the camera. An actual "wave" of this proportion would distort the surface and cause major destruction of features on the surface.
This is a simple problem of greasy hands leaving an area for 'developer' to cling to. This shows up as a finger / palm or thumb print. The little sphericals are actually liquid droplets. Artifacts from Film and print processing. ...
__________________
HENRI BERGSON, Matter and Memory
One has not only an ability to perceive the world but an ability to alter one's perception of it; more simply, one can change things by the manner in which one looks at them.
Hi Lightsoff and qmantoo its interesting that NASA decided to leave the flaws in though. Honest of them. Or (as I've said before) do these photographic flaws hide something else even more anomalous. Not everytime maybe but this could be used as a simple way to disguise an artifact. What lies beneath?
-- Edited by The Genealogist on Thursday 27th of September 2012 09:45:05 AM
A few things popped out to me in this image, mainly the triangle shapes (one very bright) and the other in the bottom right hand corner of the darker image.
The white jagged anomalies could simply be an error of some sort- I'm no photographic expert, maybe someone could shed some light on these.
I believe the Lunar Orbiter images had quite a few strange processing problems (some looking like a sweaty thumb-print) such as the white "blobby: thing in these pictures. This occurs in many LO pictures, so I assume it is a processing artifact. Some of the more exact black triangles are image markers I think - which possibly gives some indication of direction of the film (which was processed & scanned onboard and sent digitally to earth)
-- Edited by qmantoo on Thursday 27th of September 2012 12:57:33 AM
