Alien Anomalies

Though there are certainly other factors, usually the answer to these types of questions would have something to do with money and the 'government'.

When you really ask that question, Qmantoo, I really don't know any of those other factors.

I have to say in the light of evidence produced by much in-depth research that I am very concerned at the damage that has been caused by the various missions to Mars.

When Viking landed on Mars we were shown the martian landscape. Images were presented showing the correct colours of the terrain and the sky was blue. Scientific instruments tested various parameters and a report stated that a signature was picked up that could indicate life existed on the planet.

Since the Viking mission there has been an explosion of activity in sending missions to find out more about the planet. Unfortunately, NASA and the other scientific communities seem to have side-stepped the main issue of trying to determine if there is a genuine life existence in evidence. That research, it would seem, has been left for the pseudo-science community to investigate and determine. I can honestly say that the research I have been involved in has returned a great deal of evidence which suggests that life does exist on the planet but, as I stated elsewhere, it is not of 'earthly' proportions. I believe the mature martians that were of 'earthly' proportions landed on this planet thousands of years ago to escape an impending catastrophe on their own planet. I also believe, from the evidence of extended research, that their direct descendants are still here but can only be found in one place.

In view of this, I am most concerned about the damage being done by the missions. I feel that in the early days a special mission should have been sent to determine whether life exists and, if it does, what kind of life is it. Best to find out first rather than open the stable door after the horse has bolted.

My personal opinion is that we should not send men to Mars if it is found that we are encroaching on new territory which is showing positive signs of being inhabited, even if the species on the planet consists of very tiny beings. How would people on Earth feel if a massive rover landed on this planet and the motion of its wheels were killings thousands of people? We would firstly want to know where the craft came from and secondly, the best method we could find to destroy it. This is exactly how the tiny martians must feel at the present time. 

If man can not solve their problems here on earth is he able to build new community?
If the U.S.A. wants other nations subject to his will, respect human rights and humanity in general, why do  they not start by creating a model community in the territory where they have full "control"?  

1)  Why do you think sending people to Mars is a bad idea, Qmantoo?

2)  Chandre, can you explain your statement?  I know artificial gravity is possible, but beyond that, your statement isn't being backed up in your post.  If you must, refer me to another topic.