Our research has to have a point. A reason for researching.
What IS that reason?
Yes, we can post more and more examples of anomalous things, but there has to be a point when most normal people would say...
I have seen enough to convince me that there is more going on in Antarctica/Moon/Mars/Space than we have been told. From now on, I will not believe the normal media reporting of these space events.
Obviously the amount of evidence to get to this point is different for each person, but we need to concentrate on showing the very best examples of what we have found and the evidence which most people would say was most unlikely, yet it still exists. (and can be shown to exist in a clear image or with clear argument)
Just posting quantity is rather like trying to force information into a child's head by repeatedly hitting their head against the wall.
Like we are saying...
look at this...(shows Exhibit A)
that doesn't convince you? well look at this then...(shows exhibit B)
that still doesn't convince you? well look at this then...(shows exhibit C)