ripped000, your comments make for interesting reading.
For some time I have been very concerned that some of the current images of Antarctica used in Google Earth are of such poor quality that they are just not worth bothering with. The captures captured during 2008/9 were far more superior, but for some unknown reason those particular images are no longer available. The current verions we now see, especially those of the rocky outcrop close to the Troll research station, are of very poor quality, but here is something from the 21-12-2011 image capture that may be of interest to members.
The location is Lat: 72 03 33.773 S; Long: 02 54 29.34 E
What caught my eye in this view were the geometrical shapes on the surface and what looks like dirt tracks. Some of these geometrical shapes are very similar to the shapes I have found on the lunar landscape. I call the shapes 'square or rectangular donuts'. The scientific communities tell us that there is not an indigenous population living on Antarctica. If that really is the case, then who could have built the structural formations that can be seen in this view? I am convinced, by enlarging the image, that the shapes being observed are not 'rocks and gravel' as the the Norwegians seem to think.
Would the scientists tell us the truth if there are built structures on Antarctica which were constructed by people from another world? I think not, so we have to find out for ourselves to determine the real truth and that seems to be a major problem with researching not only Antarctica, but Mars and the moon as well. Even the quality of some of those off-world images leave a lot to be desired.
Two images are shown here.
I have tried to improve the quality to a degree to make for easier viewing, The second image shows some of the features ringed with an ellipse.
Do you think these shapes are structures, groups of structures or just large rocks that seem to have geometrical form?
Image courtesy of Google Earth - 2011.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Hello Everyone, new member and first post. I looked at timewarps first pic on this thread and combed over everything inch by inch. I know there is a human base at this location but im trying to figure out if they are rearranging the landscape or exploring and studying. The rearranging would mean cover up. The image is the same area that timewarp posted and is taken from google earth. I viewed the same area through the timelapse feature and found areas that looked carved out. These were around the eyes, mouth and surrounding facial features. All over this area are multiple giant facial features carved out from the mountain range. The evidence are in the carved out marks left on the facial features. This range may be the true evidence. Anyways, below the chin are more areas that seem to have been carved. Im not sure what type of rock these mountains are comprised of. My only question is the angles of the features making it impossible for us to do it.
Here is a visual breakdown of the other image shown above.
You may not believe what you can observe in this image, but it is genuine. The camera doesn't lie.
This particular area of Antarctica has obviously remained undiscovered by humans for thousands of years - until now.
There is nowhere else on the planet where heads and faces on this scale form an integral part of built structures. I have found, by examining other sites, that this form of construction is a major part of this civilization's cultural identity.
Looking at these images is like looking down on a fairytale world, but I suspect the 'people' who developed this region are a highly advanced civilization who would not appear to have any contact with the rest of humanity.
Look at the content within each circle and you will find that it all begins to make sense. The content gives us a good idea as to what this race of beings look like and I think you will agree that their appearance is similar to ours.
Searching for evidence of this this particular civilization has formed a major part of my research over the last five years, the details of which are beginning to bear fruit. I am of the opinion that the scientific world do not know of what is displayed here. If they do know, they are being mighty secretive about it.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
I have to agree that the features in the images shown above are not easy to spot. When examining an image I am in the fortunate position of being able to zoom in to make an analysis.
The last two images show what I believe are views of a huge city.
In this image, the green arrow is pointing to a large chimney stack and the red arrow to an unusual surface feature. I have also circled some of the other features to aid recognition.
If the features are still hard to observe, let me know and I shall try to work some improvements.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Haha - my street is many floors down and they dont speak my language. Maybe you could post an example of what they CAN see and what an obvious anomaly looks like - to the man in the street?
Of course, if you are saving all this evidence for your revalatory book, then I quite understand! (only joking)
1)If you walked up to a man in the street and showed him this picture, If you asked him if there was anything unusual in it, would he see what you were talking about without you pointing it out?
You know, I actually do this technique on occasion when I am unsure if my interpretation of something is biased.
__________________
What if Pinnochio says that his nose will grow longer?
At this resolution, this is not clear. By that I mean, it is not clear to anyone looking at this picture for the first time. This is the criteria we have to strive for. Sorry, but it needs to be OBVIOUS.
Think about it this way...
If you walked up to a man in the street and showed him this picture, If you asked him if there was anything unusual in it, would he see what you were talking about without you pointing it out?
Never did I think that I would come across anything as exquisite as this.
This view below is from the same area as the previous image.
The architecture is completely alien to anything on this planet except for recognizing structures such as towers on buildings, small dome-shaped objects and tall chimneys. The buildings are densly packed together with some larger ones being more prominent. Some of the built shapes have features that are definitely not of this world. But where could a civilization with these advanced skills have come from? The clues to finding the answer to this question are contained in other threads on the forum.
I will post a review later of what I can see in the image.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
I believe the image below is one of the clearest GE images I have obtained of the surface detail. I would describe the amount of detail as intense. There are thousands of structures showing in the image and it is only a small part of the selected study area.
I have processed the image to improve the edge definition. The color saturation has been reduced to near greyscale to improve observation.
Look closely and see if you can spot any recognizable objects or anomalies.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
We could easily assume that these are underground or military human bases.
However, there are many of the same doughnut-shaped structures that we see on Mars and so this connection suggests that there is at least an alien presence or that they are using the same technology.
The point is that we do not normally accept that any being can live in such extreme conditions, but Mars is extrreme and there are beings on Mars. Why should their biology be like ours? Why do they need to do the same things our bilogy needs. Water for example - if your biology is based on silica or some other atom, then maybe you do not 'drink' water. Carbon biology like ours needs water which is essential for our life, but we must not atrribute the same characteristics both physical and mental to them as we do ourselves.
Terminology is not really relevant when investigating these kind of things since for me anything hidden which involves aliens, is important for everyone to know because it affects every aspect of their life and it is a controlling aspect of the government which could very easily make our life so much better and possibly end poverty and famine forever. Certainly, it would end our reliance on oil (and all the implications of that!)
in my opinion we are looking to structures connected with undergorund secret bases, that's the only solution possibile if we assume the extreme climatic conditions of the area. more than an indipendet civilization, i'd speak of "seceret activities", probabl lead by the military establishement, mainliy developed in the underground, something like Area 51. but evrything is possible.
qmantoo, I have found the area you referenced and there is plenty of detail to observe. I believe this is fairly close to one of the images I posted recently.
I have to say that this thread is getting more interesting by the day. What I cannot find is evidence of wide straight roads on the surface but this would seem to be a common factor. Therefore I have to assume that there may be some form of interconnection between structures or they could be using covered land corridors. Of course, there's always the possibility that large tunnels may exist underground which connect the local populated areas. It is also possible that if the ice is stable they may have constructed tunnels in the ice to link major populated domains.
By the number and type of structures found means that this particular Antarctic civilization is advanced and intelligent and more importantly, they would have been on the continent a very long time. This raises more food for thought. Where and how do they obtain their drinking water? Where do they grow their food, on or under the surface? Do they have means of transportation and if so, what methods would they possibly use? Do they have supplies of electricity or gas? How is sewage dealt with etc? The list could go on......
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
72deg 00mins 09.95secs S, 2deg 34mins 36.96secs E elev 4450ft Eye alt 5193
Ok, so here is the context and there are many things in this section.The previous image is outlined in yellow. There are these feint, fairly straight lines which I have marked in various colours and I think they may be attached to these large doughnut-shaped structures, one of which I have circled in (pretty) pink! haha. There is a main high street running from the start of the two red straight lines all the way through the yellow box with structures all along it. The green line is another feint transparent line but it is not so straight as some of the others. All-in-all a very interesting image.
Whether these cities/settlements are in use now or whether they are abandoned is another matter. I dont know how we would tell either way.
I am trying to find the location of the image you posted above but it's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. |If you copied the full image the reference info should be available.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
qmantoo, is it possible thatyou could post a context image with reference to the location of your image shown above. I have looked at the reference coordinates you have given but the terrain I see appears to be different to the terrain in your image.
The idea of Antarctica being pristine and clean is misinformation. I have come across places in the images where there is evidence of surface activity. On the subject of mining, I have found evidence at one location that would definitely appear to be a quarry of some description. The blue material has also been observed but more research is required to determine exactly what this material could possibly be.
On the question of pipes, these can be observed in many images. What the pipes carry is open to debate. If it was water, surely it would freeze, unless it is hot water.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
I am now convinced that there is a huge, massive mining operation in Antarctica. This is partly because I see masses of the dark blue coloured material, which I have seen in other areas before and is related to mining operations.
I feel that this blue stuff is a by-product of whatever it is they need as there is too much wasted for it to be the main product. I wonder what could be there in such vast quantities that they are able to extract it and leave such a lot of waste material.
The other things I have noticed is that there are many large buildings, machines and pipelines going around all over the place.
They must have been there for years and years because the extent of their cities and the extent of these mining operations is not something that was started yesterday.
It really makes a joke of how we are supposed to be keeping this area pristine and clean when the aliens are raping and pillaging the landscape right under our noses. I think this protective treaty is a way to keep people out.
Apart from the structures, which are fairly obvious. I have marked the doughnuts(donuts) with light blue circles.
The yellow arrows point to some kind of cable perhaps? (maybe just a join in the photograph from different satellite image strips?) and there is also another cable? coming from the base at the south west corner of this photograph and going off northeast. That one I did not mark as it was not so obvious. The one I have marked appears as if it is a an out-of-focus or semi-transparent strip between the yellow arrows.
The yellow circle shows a brown arch, but there are just so many structures that I could not mark all of them before I got fed up!
The red arrows point to a join line which has a serrated edge, but more importantly is green/brown coloured on one side of the serrated edge and not so on the other.
This leads me to think that maybe this green/brown colouring has been added after the image was taken and where they have joined two strips together, the green/brown areas do not match up. See the white area a little bit to the right of halfway between the red arrow markers.
I think this section is taken from 72d 00m 09.96S, 2d 34m 36.96E
very intrsting Timewarp i can see a couple of strange anomalies looking like structures, in particular the "white spherical object" on the shoreline in the first image u posted, and the other object looking like a sort of tower. i heard time ago about the so colled "Operation Highjump", lead bu USA in Antartica in 1947, supposed to be connected to secret and ufo-related objectives, and in particular a possible Nazi secret research base. im starting to belive that there could be soemthing of real in the operation highjump conspiracy theory, some of the anomalies u spotted seem to point in this direction, lets see if we can find other heavy stuff.
Following on from the previous images, I have developed a simple process to obtain a closer view without any degradation to the image data.
The Norwegians maintain that there are no structures on the terrain or the nearby mountain which is located very close to their Troll research.
The following three images, although produced in a smaller format, show some really amazing detail. Note the structures and human-looking artforms that are crafted into the landscape. Only an advanced and intelligent race of beings could produce such sophisticated features. This particular civilization obviously find the climatic conditions most suitable to their needs.
Would you agree that there are many stuctures showing?
I would be very grateful to read your opinion about what can be observed.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Here is a close view of the area to the left of the location shown in the previous images.
In the view shown below there are many structures. A tower can also be observed near the center of the image. Some of the structures are built to appear as 'faces'. This form of construction is a common factor and is a major part of this civilization's cultural identity. Some members may feel that they have seen similar forms in the images from Mars.
Could this possibly be a link which gives us a clue where this Antarctic civilization came from?
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
To illustrate the points made in the above text here are some images of an area I am currently researching.
You will notice that from a distance the detail on the surface is well-camouflaged, but the closer to the surface we get the features start to show. Notice also the distance of the site and altitude compared with the location of Troll station.
I have increased the color saturation in the fourth image by 100%.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
<< timewarp, you really think they are oblivious to what is around them? >>
The simple answer to your question is, yes I do think the Troll team members are oblivious to what is around them.
Due to the hostile climatic conditions where the Troll base is located it would not surprise me at all if members of the scientific team have ventured very far on foot into the more remote terrain or scaled the high mountain to see what is there, so in these circumstances they would not have any idea of what there is to discover, especially in the more remote regions of the immediate area.
I believe the team members only use mechanised tranport to get to the areas of scientific research, therefore it is likely that these particular locations would be on level ground and not on the slopes leading up to the higher ground.
I suggest the only reasons why the structural features have not been seen by the flight crews or passengers is probably due to a couple of things. Firstly, the landmass is not on the flight path to and from the airfield and secondly, from a high viewpoint the well-camouflaged ground features would not be observed. It's only when the surface is scanned and viewed close up that the structural features on the surface can be identified.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
I am very surprised the Nowegian expedition team are not aware of what is on their doorstep. This particular mountainous area is displaying many complex structural features. There is no information anywhere relating to the stuctures or who built them.
The views below show a context view, a general view and a cropped view that has been rotated to assist viewing.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
So, if I'm correct the anomaly should be somewhere in the red box area which is conveniently angled so you cannot see it in this image. Any other images you may have found that mights show a different angle ?
The first location and associated views relate to an area that is over the crest of the mountain. This location cannot be seen from the airfield. The photgraph confuses the situation slightlly as there are two ridges. Looking from the airfield, the left-hand ridge is higher than the right-hand ridge. The second location is on the lower slope that leads up to the crest of the higher left-hand ridge. See context image below.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Timewarp, correct me if I'm wrong. Your original image showed the anomaly behind the crest of the mountain as per my arrow below looking at the view from the airfield. This one shows it in another position. Which one is correct because in the latest we should see it on the image from the airfield on the left peak ?
Timewarp, you are right. It almosts seems to be a stupa style square based structure but it is hard to be sure because the surrounding terrain acts like a camouflage pattern and makes it hard for the eye to focus. It is reminiscent of what we have seen in some of the images on Mars. I wonder is they have a land-based way of creating camouflage in the same way that we use nets to cover our weapons etc ? If that was so then it is unlikely that pilots would see it or people that were not looking closely for it. What I find interesting is the aerial image further down and then the image of the airfield with the 'mountain' in the background. Now, call me naive as I am not a mountaineer but that does not look so impossible to climb or so high and inaccessible that humans would not have explored it. After all, do we not climb mountains 'because they are there'. Now if I was based there for months at the foot of that mountain and with it being the only bit appearing to stick out of the ice for miles around I can assure you my little footprints would be all over it out of sheer boredom. Any mountaineers out there that can comment on how impassable this mountain appears to be from the Norwegian governments comments ?
Very interesting post gents I see definite signs of structures as circled plus two more. Sadly I cannot work on Google Earth so will just have to look at the images you have supplied. Look forward to more comments from other members.
Yes, thats good, now we can see the context and how close they all are to each other. I suppose the Norwegian Troll station is out there because they do air pollution research for a number of different countries and organisations including 2 or 3 chinese banks which I thought a little odd. Anyway... Here are maps of the Byrd expeditions and other diagramatic maps.
or Located at 72°00′06″S 02°32′02″E. (if you dont like decimals)
google map (zoom out after noticing the doughnuts(donuts) in this picture)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(research_station) It has an overwintering capacity of eight people and a summer capacity of 40. It is served by Troll Airfield, which is the base for the Dronning Maud Land Air Network. The station is located on the nunatak bare ground area Jutulsessen, at 1,270 meters (4,170 ft) above mean sea level. It is completely surrounded by the Antarctic ice sheet. This is unlike most other Antarctic research stations, which are located on snow. Troll is 235 kilometers (146 mi) from the coast.
Troll Airfield is an airstrip located 6.8 kilometers (4.2 mi) from the research station Troll in Princess Martha Coast in Queen Maud Land, Antarctica. Owned and operated by the Norwegian Polar Institute, it consists of a 3,300-by-100-meter (10,800 by 330 ft) runway on glacial blue ice on the Antarctic ice sheet. The airport is located at 1,232 meters (4,042 ft) above mean sea level and is 235 kilometers (146 mi) from the coast. There are no buildings or structures at the runway, although some services are provided from the research station. Ground handling, including supply of Jet A-1 fuel, is provided by the crew at Troll. The crew also supply services such as a fire and rescue service, communications and overnighting at Troll for personnel who would be stuck because of bad weather.
Dronning Maud Land Air Network Project (DROMLAN) is a coordinated project between eleven countries with bases in Queen Maud Land (Norwegian: Dronning Maud Land) to create an coordinated logistics service to reduce costs. The participating countries are Belgium, Finland, Germany, India, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia, South Africa, Sweden and United Kingdom. The services are operated using Russian Ilyushin 76, Norwegian and Swedish C-130 Hercules and Norwegian P-3 Orion aircraft.[5] The flights operate from Cape Town International Airport, with a flight time of up to nine hours for a Hercules aircraft,[6] and five and a half hours for an Il-76.
There is a research station near to this location. It is the Norwegian "Troll" station which is located to the west over the other side of a small mountain.
The people who built the structures are a highly developed race and they would also appear to be very well organized. They are intelligent and I suspect they have a human appearance and they are able to cope with the severe climatic conditions.
The question is, considering the Norwegian base is so close, less than 4km, there has not been any reports from the Troll scientific team about what we can see in the image. I find that quite amazing. Surely I am not the first person to find this undiscovered and unreported civilization?
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
After many hours of researching this area, I am of the opinion that there was, or there still is, an intelligent civilization in residence on Antarctica.
The area in question is not that far from where the German military built a secret base during the Second World War. To be honest, I have never seen structures like those that can be observed in the image.
The coordinates of the view are as follows.
Lat: 72 01 44.54 S Long: 02 37 12.57 E
Elevation of terrain: 1198m
Eye altitude: 1.48km
General view of the area.
Here is a closer view.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."