I can only "amplify" or make more visible what is there. Unless I have a crystal ball, that is! I cannot see these Mt Rushmore faces or any other faces but I am quite prepared to believe that they are there or anything else, just about.
I do not understand enough about the way layers are placed on a photograph(or more importantly, removed from a photograph) to do any more. If someone can explain how I can remove layers from a JPG image, then I will do my best to program it.
In my gut, I suspect that these layers are only available in proprietry image formats and as soon as they become JPGs or PNGs then this ability to distinguish between layers is lost and everything is combined into one 'flat' image. I am only just learning about this, so I maybe wrong.
Gmantoo the image is not like an orange that you can peel off. You are correct the image is flat. What I am describing is the method they applied on the top side of the image.
That part was singled out by their program and applied the "mountaines and sky algoruithm". So if what they do with their imagery is aplly F(x) to every single pixel, what I do is I manage to find f-1(x).
I have been heralding this to the four winds, but not even Mr skipper is interested at the moment.
In the meantime I have begun developing a practical manual on several deobfuscation techniques I know and I am able to apply, depending on the image source and special features you find in them.
Fake shadows. inversed image, inversed key locations and the rest the same, obfuscated depth and topography, histogram scrambling, and on Venus inversed altogether.
Everybody now and in the futrure will agree that not even in the fifth dimension photographs will look so spooky as the ones on Venus. Simple: they are inverted.
There are others that are boldly painted (I wonder why nobody complains). Some of the Venus images are just painted over, so to see what's underneath becomes very complicated because you will never arrive at a natural texture to display the image, even though you manage to take a glimpse at features they were hiding.
I can only "amplify" or make more visible what is there. Unless I have a crystal ball, that is! I cannot see these Mt Rushmore faces or any other faces but I am quite prepared to believe that they are there or anything else, just about.
I do not understand enough about the way layers are placed on a photograph(or more importantly, removed from a photograph) to do any more. If someone can explain how I can remove layers from a JPG image, then I will do my best to program it.
In my gut, I suspect that these layers are only available in proprietry image formats and as soon as they become JPGs or PNGs then this ability to distinguish between layers is lost and everything is combined into one 'flat' image. I am only just learning about this, so I maybe wrong.
Hi Chandre The hills and the sky are hiding a set of mammoth face sculptures one next to the other.
However this is not the most important thing, what is important is how our eyes are cheated by their filter. Here is the real depth of the image, look at what we were missing!
I'll try deobfuscating the sky and mountains as they have been treated separately with independent layers, that should be treated in isolation. Stay tuned.
When I see this type of image manipulation it annoys me.
The American tax-payer coughed up a lot of dollars for these missions to take place, only to see the returned results played around with. It's as though the general public are being treated by these institutions as if we are children and think that certain detail in the images should be removed or smudged so as not to offend. This attitude by NASA/JPL and the other space-science institutions has to stop.
I am fed up with the garbage they are releasing into the public domain when one considers that they have very sophisticated and advanced technology at their disposal. The universities and the other scientific institutions get the genuine image data, therefore we should have access to it as well.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Chandre I discussed this with gmantoo long time ago in his ufo findings in the Mars' sky.
We reached the conclusion that the skies were being tampered. Therefore what gmantoo is confirming here is something that we have already been able to prove before.
I think discoveries by forum members are getting more compelling every time.
A perfect example of this might be this picture below which I was playing with - only to discover a new layer in the distance.
It is interesting to speculate that there is another line of hills/mountains in the background - behind the perfectly white sky.
If this is true, I wonder why it is done? (We have our theories, right?) The line of hills to the right in the background have absolutely no features at all and appear to be added. (Try zooming in to them, there is nothing.) Original