Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Mars Anomaly Research archive -> Alien Anomalies -> Tampering Evidence -> Censorship of imagery from space religiously motivated
Post Info TOPIC: Censorship of imagery from space religiously motivated
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
RE: Censorship of imagery from space religiously motivated
Permalink  
 

This UFO report might further support my hypothesis -- Frutty

 

 



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

TenderHero wrote:

My feeling about all this YouTuber thing?

80% Walt Disney and 20% Japanese Animated film studio work.

As people (read also: so called scientist) swallow everything nowadays...



Yes agreed. Some material however corresponds exactly with the pictures in this thread discussed below.

 

The Apollo missions in the sixties used similar techniques, and 80% of the world population still think they are real.

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
TenderHero


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 19
Date:
Permalink  
 

My feeling about all this YouTuber thing?

80% Walt Disney and 20% Japanese Animated film studio work.

As people (read also: so called scientist) swallow everything nowadays...


__________________
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nice one Frutty!

JAXA calls this 'high definition'. Is this the best they could come up with?  The only interesting part of the clip, as far as quality is concerned, is from 0:54 to 1:08, just before it crashed. The earlier part is the usual poor quality that we have to deal with.

Whoever is on the moon is not going to very pleased with JAXA, that's for sure.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Apparently here is a close shot of our friends smilehmm

 

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

I feel there is nothing wrong with this thread.

What the succession of images in this thread show is that there is more on the far side of the moon than we were originally given to believe. To deny viewers that vital scientific information would place us in the same category as those who obfuscated the images in the first place.

Discovering the real truth of what is out there in space and on other worlds is about using whatever means possible at our disposal to reach a justifiable and viable conclusion. Nothing should stand in the way of genuine scientific exploration.



__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Moderator could you please erase this thread altogether? I realized after posting it, I was wrong and in fact I was tampering the images. I realized my technique is faulty and  I would not want to mislead future visitors into thinking something might be wrong with these photographs. Thank you 

== Frutty


__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

I hear ya timewarp....

Never said notin about an atmosphere though.....who says they were "breathing" so to speak. They could have been visiting just like us....however many of 1000 years ago....Or of course..could still be there today...

One big point is 1/3 gravity....Ought to help any mega lithic structure survive. And if I'm not mistaken....Astronauts accounts of these structures said something along the line of crystal or glass...sounds like building materials we are not used to ....

Of course...I as welll as the skipper or any body else is inclined to make mistakes...

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

SP, that's exactly what I am trying to do - keep an open mind.

I have counted the number of pixels high the 'statue' is and found it to be 80 pixels. This would mean that the object is 80km or 50 miles high. I have also circled another interesting object to the right of the image which appears to be a structure. I found this object to be 35 pixels high, so using the original scale the structure would be 35km in height. To me this is completely unrealistic. I can fully understand the statue being 80 meters or 265 feet high and the structure 35 meters or 108 feet high, but definitely not miles high.

I have also tried to emulate how this particular view would really appear when viewed from a spacecraft. We have to remember that the location of the view is on the far side of the moon, therefore it would be out of sight to earth observers.

There are hundreds of objects in this image that would seem to be built structures. How could the inhabitants have constructed these objects when, according to NASA, there is hardly any useful atmosphere on the moon? Are the residents really able to survive in a partial vacuum? That takes a lot of believing. 

Moon_city_far_755.jpg

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

Far as the whole scale thing goes....

I disagree Timewarp--only in the sense that you say that "the inhabitants would be gigantic".

I mean....look at us...we build 1/4 - 1/2 mile tall steel structures now...and that height grows by the decade....that doesn't make us any bigger ...does it? Think what our buildings will be in 50 years!!! A hundred years!!!!.....And I dare say it....but 500.....1000 years....


I'm inclined to go with skippers original findings on this one as it can no longer be verified.

I do understand the shear scale of it all is astounding...But so is extraterrestrial life. I'm sure they have or had far more advanced alloys and compounds for building materials...

Just saying...keep an open mind

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

ARP2 wrote. "Timewarp, How did you bring out such clarity?"

Patience and yet more patience! Only slight adjustments were made to the image.

The program I used to show up the features in this particular image was Paint Shop Pro v6.0.  Not the best of graphics programs, but the menus are better constructed and make for quick and easy selection.

My thanks go to Frutty for 'unPhotoShopping' the original image which has revealed a fantastic amount of 'hidden' detail.

The reason I circled so many features in the image shown above was to highlight that what we are dealing with here is typical of martian constructional and landscape art. Many of the observed features are similar. The same art-forms can be found in some of the images from Mars. The 'key' to recognizing any martian facial art-forms is the unusual cranial protrusion. This is a very important as art-forms of heads and faces showing this feature have now been found on the Moon, Mars and this planet.

The area in the original image, that has been well obscured in an effort to deny any form of recognition, would appear to be a large statue and it's size dominates the surrounding landscape. The statue consists of an upright figure riding on the back of what looks like a dog or similar animal. Notice the two pointed ears on the animal's head.

I cannot agree with the scale of this image - 1km = 1 pixel. I believe the scale is closer to 1meter = 1 pixel, which is more realistic. Using the original scale the inhabitants would be gigantic and the statue would be a very high structure. This is just not feasible therefore, I have based my assumptions with regards to the true scale of this image as being close to the latter measurement.  


__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
Chandre


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

The shape you've revealed is reminiscent of the 'spire' or 'castle' can't remember the exact name that Enterprise discussed. It seems to be larger though. If there are more than one similar shaped anomaly then you can assume intelligent design. The question is...what are they ? My guess is some sort of a docking station for craft so they don't have to land on the surface ? Reminds me of Arthur Clarkes vision and as we are discovering,he seems to have known an awful lot that cannot be explained.

__________________
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

lol......ya....but I won't hold my breath for that oneweirdface.gif

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Software_Pyrate wrote:

O ya ....duh...........

Ya...thats what I'm saying ..freakin huuuuggggeee



To investigate what it could possibly be the next manned mission to the moon should land on top of one of those cats whisper.gif



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

O ya ....duh...........

Ya...thats what I'm saying ..freakin huuuuggggeee

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
AliensRPeople2


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 172
Date:
Permalink  
 

Timewarp,
How did you bring out such clarity? Very cool...

ARP2


__________________
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Software_Pyrate wrote:

Hey fruit....are you sure on the scale?.....

wouldn't that put that tower at about 60-70km wide or so at the base....??



If you abide by the information Mr skipper posted that thing must be Huuuuuuuge! confuse (Read on top of the pic)

 

2-068-tower-lines.jpg



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hey fruit....are you sure on the scale?.....

wouldn't that put that tower at about 60-70km wide or so at the base....??

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

1 pixel = 1km.

On the other hand the scene shows some kind of dynamics to it.

P.S. I am of the opinion Mankind has not ever set foot on the moon. The moon is crammed with these kinds of things. The moon you see on National Geographic, newspapers and Magazines, BBC, Scienc channel, official maps etc etc is whitewashed into a cratered desolated dead world. That's not reality. We live in a virtual world, managed by virtual people behind curtains.

 

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

I've been working on the image that was originally provided by Skipper and enhanced by Frutty to reveal the detail.

I believe I have found out the reason why the powers that be didn't want us to see what is really contained in the image It's obvious that what can be seen is a huge city. I have a sneaky feeling that the original inhabitants didn't get as far as this planet, so they had to make do with landing on the Moon, and have been there ever since. It would appear that they have been there a very long time.

The second image shows similar characteristics to some of the images already posted on the forum.

Take your time to view the features. You'll be amazed at what there is to see.

General view of the city - lightened and slightly sharpened.

moon_city_755.jpg


View of the city with features circled.

moon_city_circ_755.jpg


Now we know the reason why NASA seems very reluctant to return to the moon.

I wonder if the inhabitants are able to watch "The X factor"?

Does anyone know the width per pixel of this image?

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
AliensRPeople2


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 172
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yeah software...

There ARE Multiverses!  You are right...biggrin

And right about religion. Religion, not spirituality can and has shown to be a frequent problem to civilized societies...

What? The world is NOT flat?  confuse Next you'll be telling me that there is no Santa Clause!!!

ARP2


__________________
Software_Pyrate


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

There is an episode of Family Guy called "Multiverse" where they go through different dimensions and one of the dimensions they go to is one that has not been "held back" from religion so to speak. They end up being a 1000 years more advanced because there is no religion to suppress the scientific community.

In a nutshell....its true.

It was the same religious fanatics that hung people that argued the world is round---not flat.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unfortunately...the same is true today.

When will TPTB wake up, and give us a little credit....


So.....yes....I would agree that religion has, does, and is keeping us from the truth.


P.S.
I am a GOD fearing man, but religion is man made, thus.....

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

All credit goes to Mr Skipper the tenacious investigator without whose weekly reviews I would not have become interested in the subject.

Obfuscated

2-068-tower-lines.jpg


Unphotoshopped

Moon Cities.jpg






__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

My pleasure GM. But before I do this I want you to understand one thing once and for all. We are the skeptics. You are the gullible.

 

Here http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2004/068/1-068-big-tower-.jpg

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
qmantoo


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

...and the original link please?

__________________


 
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Timewarp wrote:

Does NASA think we're stupid?

To find out what's really in the above image, concentrate not on the central obfuscated section but on the land formations and what is on those formations. To me, what I see in the image is a city of many structures in block patterned layout. I believe that the central feature has been tampered with to create confusion. Just research what's around it and you will see.



Got it timewarp will see how long it takes for all the members of this forum to catch up.no



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Timewarp


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

Does NASA think we're stupid?

To find out what's really in the above image, concentrate not on the central obfuscated section but on the land formations and what is on those formations. To me, what I see in the image is a city of many structures in block patterned layout. I believe that the central feature has been tampered with to create confusion. Just research what's around it and you will see.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

The central part was almost destroyed.

I think in the upper part, of the more censored area, there was a throne and a statue sitting in it.

I've already found many thrones with characters sitting on the Moon and on Mars

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sorry for the typo prophane instead of prohane . lol aww

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
fruitnut1


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Moon Censorship.jpg

__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Mars Anomaly Research archive -> Alien Anomalies -> Tampering Evidence -> Censorship of imagery from space religiously motivated
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard