Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Lunar Base cleaned up


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
RE: Lunar Base cleaned up
Permalink  
 


Timewarp wrote:

Gentlemen, I stand corrected.

Please accept my apologies for misinterpretation of this particular image. 

I have checked the original data in the Apollo archives and found you were perfectly correct in saying the object in question is the extended coil antenna onboard the satellite which is facing down towards the moon's surface.

However, if there was a huge mast on the moon, this is how it would appear taking into account the angle of the satellite relative to the vertical and the perspective.




TM, take a look at this image without preconceptions, just as if it were for the very first time ....

Alien Tech.jpg

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

Gentlemen, I stand corrected.

Please accept my apologies for misinterpretation of this particular image. 

I have checked the original data in the Apollo archives and found you were perfectly correct in saying the object in question is the extended coil antenna onboard the satellite which is facing down towards the moon's surface.

However, if there was a huge mast on the moon, this is how it would appear taking into account the angle of the satellite relative to the vertical and the perspective.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Timewarp wrote:

qmantoo and Frutty,

In one of the series of lunar images, the antenna attached to the satellite can be seen clearly. In the image shown above the top of the mast is not attached to anything and the parabolic reflectors get smaller lower down the masts. This is due to perspective as the top of the mast is closer to the camera than the base. It can also be seen that the bottom of the mast is anchored to a very large base. Check it out and you will see.




no



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

BTW, the image is the original and has only been rotated ninety degrees. No other adjustments to the image have been made.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

qmantoo and Frutty,

In one of the series of lunar images, the antenna attached to the satellite can be seen clearly. In the image shown above the top of the mast is not attached to anything and the parabolic reflectors get smaller lower down the masts. This is due to perspective as the top of the mast is closer to the camera than the base. It can also be seen that the bottom of the mast is anchored to a very large base. Check it out and you will see. 

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

qmantoo wrote:

I though we established that these 'antenna masts' on the right edge of the picture were some part of the satellite taking the picture? This picture has appeared before somewhere on the forum I think. I seem to have read a comment by Marsrocks or someone(maybe xenon, cannot remember who, sorry) on that thread that this was the case.




lol, gm. no



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

I though we established that these 'antenna masts' on the right edge of the picture were some part of the satellite taking the picture? This picture has appeared before somewhere on the forum I think. I seem to have read a comment by Marsrocks or someone(maybe xenon, cannot remember who, sorry) on that thread that this was the case.

__________________


 



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

The reason why no shadows of the masts are showing in the image is because they were removed by a graphical process at source.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 184
Date:
Permalink  
 

Timewarp wrote:

The two main objects are the very tall masts with dish antenna installed their full length. This also makes sense when taking into account prospective. The dishes closer to the camera are larger than those at the bottom of the masts.



Everything else in the image is casting a significant shadow. An especially egregious anomaly is a pair of huge antenna masts, each many kilometers high, that seem to cast no hint of a shadow.

 



__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

I feel the orientation of the above image makes more sense in the image shown below.

The two main objects are the very tall masts with dish antenna installed their full length. This also makes sense when taking into account prospective. The dishes closer to the camera are larger than those at the bottom of the masts.

Who installed them, or what they are used for, is a matter for conjecture, but there is something interesting to note, the dishes are all pointing in the same direction. Also, no stay wires are apparent so possibly they are self supporting.


AS16-2839_rf_towers.jpg



__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

To make it clearer.

 

These images show: the one in black and white what they want us to believe. The colored one the real landscape of our moon! wink

 

Black and white Moon fake landscape

 

Real Moon terrain

 

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

GM. I could clean up the image but it did not make sense until i filpped it around. Like you said I was prepared to find a tower because I've read about this. But what I found was no craters but a cliff with a hole in it and some gadgets on the porch. So I think you are right. I myself interpreted it that way as a  point of entry to something more sophisticated inside.

 

BTW the moon is not flat. There is no landing site on the moon which would serve our purposes. Like my motto on youtube says. We've been duped since kids.

 

-- Frutty



__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

So, underneath their 'covering up', you think that is a hole with structures around the outside ? Is that what it looks like?

__________________


 



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1015
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lunar Base.jpg

__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard