Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Just One of Many Aerials


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
RE: Just One of Many Aerials
Permalink  
 


OK, thanks guys. I see what is being shown and it does look as if there are towers and things there.

__________________


 



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Iceman

I also noticed that and it is similar to one of Hoaglands anomalies (called the Shard if I remember correctly). I am not sure if it crystal/glass or smoke, but the area it is coming out of looks anomalous as well. I will try to clarify as soon as I have some time to work on the image biggrin

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

4149_h1 ceop 2&smoke.JPG
Chandre this is fine work you have been doing. I have also a question about one thing on fallowing picture.

Is this smoke it has all characteristic of being smoke and it has also grater resolution then the tampering treatment.

 



__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi gmantoo
As Iceman has commented, we prefer to allow people to draw their own conclusions from the images rather than force our own perceptions of what is in the image onto people. I have, as requested, highlighted the anomalies that I perceive in the two examples I posted. I do not know if my scribbles make it clearer or not, I will leave that up to the viewer.

Iceman, your images posted seem very clear compared with what I see. They also remind me of the famous image of the WW2 bombing of the cathedral that left just the outer walls and part of the bell tower standing.

4149_h1 ceop 2 detail.jpg
4149_h1 crop 1 detail.jpg


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

Morning qmantoo, 

I prefer to give as little information as possible to not blinding anybody also this is as far as I know group work and that explain my lack of information given.

Another thing we can't expect being able to find two pictures of the same aria showing the same things because all pictures from NASA are so badly manipulated. Shandre calls the white powder you are talking about spray.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

avignon-popes-palace-5.jpg
Good day qmatoo,
I was trying to say I think we see very big palace or something similar on the picture. We see 3D structure of a building just a little part of it.

Some idea about the building?



__________________


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

There is an odd 'crater' in the bottem left which seems to have a false shadow application and something elevated that looks a lot like a statue.

As I said before, you really need to show us all exactly what you are talking about. You cannot just ring a crater and then expect everyone to know what you are referring to. What I think is a tower, you might think is a wall and what you think is a wall I might this is a tower.

I agree that some of the shadows in that set of Moon photos are far darker than you would expect, but that may be just the exposure or speed of film(ASA) or whatever. Of course, it may be added to obscure things, but we have to look at other pictures of the same area too, to see if the shadow has moved. If not, then it could be something else (such as a deliberate attempt by the people living there to obscure and hide their structures?) I still feel that there is too much white floss/spiders web stuff about on those pictures and I do not know what it is yet.

I have see too many strange things to say that there is "nothing strange on the Moon", but we all have to spend a little time to find other photos of the same area that show the same anomaly. Otherwise we are just pi55ing in the wind.

If the idea is to fantasize about imagained anomalies, then fine......but (as others have said here on the forum) if we want to be taken seriously, then we have to get at least two pictures(with links to original ) of the same area taken at different times,  we need to know where the sun is, and we need to have the anomaly pointed out (arrowed or outlined) to us so there is no room for error in interpretation. Anything less than this is wasting everyone's time.

I am as guilty of this as anyone else too.

__________________


 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

4149_h1 ceop 2-Guernsey The-Little-Chappel.JPG
Some idea about the building.

__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Gmantoo,

Here are two crops of the image.

In this one there appear to be structures, organic in shape. There is an odd 'crater' in the bottem left which seems to have a false shadow application and something elevated that looks a lot like a statue.

4149_h1 crop 1.jpg

In this image there appear to be a structure with a tower throwing a shadow and three parallel walls.

4149_h1 ceop 2.jpg

But thats my humble opinion...

__________________


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

chandre: I think you have to say what you see in these areas otherwise we are likely to be going off on a wild-goose-chase. As you say, there are lots of interesting areas, but tell us what do you think you see and then others can confirm or deny it.

__________________


 



Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi gmantoo
You discount your find too quickly, there may not be an aerial but the rest of the image appears to have a number of anomalies. I have ringed the areas I suggest you look more closely at and pay attention to the 'watermarks' on the image.

Its a really good image, well done for posting it.

Please excuse the squiggle that looks like a two, its an error but I don't have time to fix it...

4149_h1 contrast colour.jpg


__________________


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

I decided to do a bit more investigation on this one. The link to the 4149 page nasa original is here

The picture in the post above shows this - as a 'mast' or aerial.

4149_h1_mast_context.jpg

So, I decided to look for more photographs with the same feature in them and I found only one. 4148-h3 which shows a much clearer picture and make a lot more sense.

4148h3-4149h1_mast.jpg

Whereas in the first photograph it looked to me as if there was a 'mast' sticking up from the surface towards the camera (even though I now realise that there was no shadow!). Now I can see that it is where the edge of the crater has collapsed.

Sorry folks, it is not a mast. One more point on the scoreboard for the debunkers.

__________________


 



Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1921
Date:
Permalink  
 

There are lots of these if you search the Lunar Orbiter photographs and they are in really strange places too. Maybe they are not aerials of any kind but they sure do look like something to do with communications link to the picture here



__________________


 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard