Check out where the light source is coming from. This appears to me to be a normal crater. The shadow is not under the raised object but on the nearside of a crater.
the anomaly is too different respect to the ground around and the otehrs darker craters. personally i think that is brightness can't be justified only with the "bouncing effect", and that this is an anomaly. obviously the quality of the images ( published ) and the diffuse tampering/airbrushing make difficult to spot something not subject to "interpretation", so maybe i'm wrong.
Hi ARP2, I think Xenon may be right on this. The crater is recent as there is a shadow off a well-defined rim on the front left side of the crater. Very bright though compared to the surrounds. Found two sites that may interest those of us examining lunar anomalies http://www.lunomaly.com/ and http://lunarsightings.blogspot.com/ They both deal with the findings in the book on ULO's (unidentified lunar objects) . I find the work really interesting.
My opinion is that it is just an exposed crater (more resent than the surrounding craters, the brightness could be due to the exposed lighter soils (or ice) underneath the surface.
Images of Craters can create allusions that they are domes, more so when there is little shadow on them, most of the Martian craters are filled with wind blown dust and soils, or sediments washed down with Martian floods, whereas the moon craters are mainly covered with Basalts and meteoroid dust, except that is for the more recent impacts which still lay exposed.
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"