You're right about the links. Now, they both bring up the same page. Seems funny that when I clicked on the original link I was redirected to that site. Maybe, it was something to do with what is showing in the DoD Clementine images that the current powers that be do not want people to see.
Here is another animation that shows distinctly the object detail that is forming the crater shapes.
Note that the NASA LROC view of the same location, as seen above, does not display this amazing image object detail. It's as though a special algorithm is being used to remove all traces of the recognizable object detail that they don't want anyone to see otherwise people will start to think that the moon is inhabited, which I think it is.
I know the object detail we can observe in the clear view is a true representation of what is on the surface as I managed to reverse-process the original obfuscated image as was able to reproduce the same objects, although not as clear, of the object detail that is forming the crater shapes.
What a very clever deception on the part of the lunarians!
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
The two images used for the animation seen below were captured twenty years apart.
The crater shape seen in the centre of the views is Dawson V and the lower large crater shape is Zeeman.
The view showing the huge amount of object detail is a Clementine capture and the other image is a LROC capture.
It would appear there is something missing in the LROC view. Where is all the object detail that we can see in the Clementine view?
The Clementine mission was commissioned by the US Navy and the Department of Defense whereas NASA/JPL are responsible for the LROC QuickMap view.
Do you have any thoughts on this discrepancy or could it possibly be that a special algorithm is being used to remove object detail from the LROC views?
I am more inclined to think that the Clementine image is the genuine version. I would hate to think that a deception could be going on here. What do you think?
-- Edited by Timewarp on Wednesday 9th of March 2016 11:11:40 AM
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
The first image posted in the thread contains area of a Clementine image that is blurred out. The blur was obviously applied to obscure something on the lunar terrain.
Many seasoned researchers have tried to determine exactly what is underneath the blur, but without much success. There have even been suggestions that the obfuscation is covering a very large object. I have been able to determine that there is no large object under the blur but what the blur is covering is a large black area surrounded by many other structural-like objects.
Could it possibly be that the large black area is water and this was the original reason why the area had to be obscured?
We now know from other views posted in the thread that there are many structural shapes showing.
The animation shown below displays the detail of what is under the blurred out area.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Hi Timewarp I have always been fascinated by these images. I remember looking closely at them many moon's ago. They are some of the images that sort of got me interested in the first place. I was always a little surprised that no one mentioned the long straight structures appearing in the back ground to the upper left along with even more blurring but this is on a lesser scale than the tower. These are very visible but I've yet to see an explanation of these anomalies either way. The long structures must be miles long and although there are no shadows they seem to almost float above the surface at different point along their length.
Do you think this may be some sort of jigsaw?. I'm going to see if I can work out exactly where this all is on a map. Interested in your thoughts on these.
The image shown below is another example of a Clementine flattened view that contains blatant and deliberate obfuscation. I don't know why the image handlers bothered as they are only covering up valuable object detail on the surface. The flattening of the original and the inclusion of the blur creates the impression in the mind of the viewer that there is a large tall object in the view when in reality there is no such object.
Two images are shown below. The first is the view released into the public domain showing the blatant obfuscation.
In the second image, I have increased the contrast by a considerable degree and made an attempt to sharpen the image.
The big question is, where did this species come from originally and what do they look like?
Could they have human form or an alien-like appearance? I think the former is more probable. What do you think?
*TW, That is why we do what we do. I hope that someday we find a clue that leads us to the truth that NASA and the world governments keep from us. A clue that can help us learn the truth of our origin and the history of human beings and our universe. The beings that built those structures on the moon is anybody's guess. They could be from within our solar system, Mars, Venus, or even Earth. They could be from somewhere else within the galaxy, or even the universe. We can't understand technology we have never seen. All options are on the table, even the possibility that the moon isn't a planet at all, but a hollow satellite occupied by unknowns who monitor us, our evolution, our developments etc. Perhaps even coalition of Alien and Earthlings, who knows..
Personally, I would like to think that the structures on the moon are from an ancient alien species whom have moved on, and left a world for us to explore and learn. We as humans are explorers, like we do every time we scan the images at our computers looking for alien anomalies. Some of the structures we find seem to have steam or smoke billowing out of them, which in turn would mean that they are currently occupied... Here comes the question again... By whom?
God I wish we weren't lied to anymore.
__________________
The whole universe is to the observable universe, as the observable universe is to an atom. - Alan Guth
The image below I have lightened slightly. Usually, I would never recommend squinting at images, but for this image give it a try if only for a short period.
If you do, you will probably notice that this eye action creates a virtual 3D effect and gives a degree of depth to a 2D view, especially with this particular image. You will also notice that the structures in the upper left section of the view are of a block formation and these buildings are quite large. Also, observe the small crater-like shape to the left where the layout of the structures becomes quite obvious when performing this action. The layout of the structures and the infrastructure shows up well.
I get the impression that there is an atmosphere surrounding the moon that is very shallow compared to the atmosphere on this planet. How else would it be possible for all these structures to be constructed unless they were assembled in kit form, which I do not think likely? It would appear from all the circular pits on the surface of the moon that a great deal of mining has been taking place over a long period of time probably to secure the raw materials needed for construction purposes.
The structural evidence showing in this image proves that someone is in residence and they are there and in large numbers.
The big question is, where did this species come from originally and what do they look like?
Could they have human form or an alien-like appearance? I think the former is more probable. What do you think?
This view is a crop of the top section of the main clear image and gives us a good idea of the layout of the recognizable objects.
In the past, I have received derogatory comments when I claimed that there are built structures on the moon. At this particular location it is plain to see that there are many structures on the surface and these objects cannot be rocks or boulders. The object detail seen in the view is very real, but I have to ask why have we heard nothing about this kind of object detail from the space or scientific institutions? Is it a case that they don't want us to know what's really on the moon?
The flattened and modified image has been around for a good many years and many researchers were led to believe that the obfuscation was covering a sizeable object when in fact what it is really hiding is a large area of water. The original view only came to light recently and it was sheer chance I came across it whilst looking for something else. Since the uploading of the image to this forum it has been removed from the website that hosted it. Now, I wonder why it was promptly removed from the site. Anyway, now the original image is available for other researchers to examine in detail.
Note the grid-like formation and how the structures are aligned.
Thanks for re-visiting this TW. Very good clarity in that pic, not sure what software was used. I remember doing these pics when I first saw Skippers site. This was what I came up with using Photoshop layering (10 layers). Not as sharp but basically the same thing. As for your query on how they were built, I would conjecture they might have been assembled from very large pre packaged parts or maybe even landed there in one piece with unknown power and tech. This is not the work of Terrestrial Humans.
-- Edited by Macten on Wednesday 3rd of February 2016 10:08:05 PM
TW, Have you ever seen Alex Colliers moon presentation? He discusses in detail the smudged photo's from the clementine mission. It's worth watching. I would like to learn more about the enhanced image, if it is the original, why are we just seeing it now? It is fascinating and I hope we can dig up more info on it. Great work!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5H5w3WWNc7w
__________________
The whole universe is to the observable universe, as the observable universe is to an atom. - Alan Guth
Why are we are being led to believe that the view showing the 'hidden' area is the original capture anyway?
After investigating what I thought was an enhanced version turns out to be something quite remarkable.
I can now see that what appeared to be an enhanced image could well be the true original and not what we are being led to believe is the original.
I have examined this particular image in some considerable detail and can find no evidence of any attempt to smear or obfuscate anything.
This can mean only one thing. The so-called enhanced view is the true original and not the flattened version showing the smeared-out area.
Why obfuscate the area in the first place? I think the reason is that the black area showing in the true version is a very large area of water.
In fact, I think the smear is covering over a large lake which is surrounded by many structures and some are within the area of the lake itself.
Here is the view I examined to look for evidence of smearing and also to look for any evidence of alteration or modification near the smear area.
So ask yourself, how was I able to download an image that I took to be an enhanced version when now, within 7 days, the image has mysteriously disappeared?
I have to say that this is one of the clearest images I have observed of lunar object detail and that is why I think it is the original view.
It's just too clear to be an enhancement as much of the object detail on the surface is easily recognizable.
qmantoo, The link where the original flattened view with the smeared out large object is given below. Scroll down to Image no. 5.
As both views were 768x768 pixels, I thought this would be the ideal size to produce and animation which can be seen above. The original view and the enhanced version were downloaded on the same day two minutes apart (Sat -23 Jan. 2016). But today, on returning to the same website I have noticed that the enhanced version of image no.5 has been removed. It makes me wonder why the enhanced image all of a sudden has been removed from that particular website.
The enhanced view and the original were displayed for a long time and all of a sudden, within the last 7 days, the enhanced version has been removed. It would appear that someone doesn't want us to observe the recognizable object detail as can be seen in the enhanced view shown above.
Please can we have some links to the originals. Not that I am doubting your word but it is always easier for us if the poster gives us links.
As you know, some of us like to download the original and see what else there is to see.
Q
The image below is a pseudo-3D view and shows that we should never believe everything we are being told by the powers that be.
It's obvious from looking at the images of this location that someone has been building many structures over a period of time.
So, when people say that there is nothing on the moon except rocks and redundant hardware, you can now say that you have seen otherwise.
You will need a pair of red/blue glasses to view the image. This image shows the object detail quite well considering the quality of the enhanced image.
If this object detail was being shown to me of somewhere on this planet I would say that what I was looking at is a town or city with many buildings.
The view seen below is one of the Clementine image captures that was released into the public domain.
I have circled a feature that gives one the impression that the image has been deliberately altered. But why and what is the obfuscation hiding?
Well, I have news for you. Not only was this object deliberately blurred out but the rest of the image has been intentionally interfered with as well.
So what kind of deception is going on here and what could possibly be the reason for it? Well folks, I think I've found a visual answer to the question.
The capture appears to be a low-definition image, but whilst the circled object was blurred out the image handlers forgot that the rest of the image detail still remains.
This is unusual as the images captured during this particular mission were supposed to be high-definition for mapping and not poor quality views.
In the next post you will find an animation of the original view and the enhanced view for comparison purposes.
I hope you are sitting comfortably as I think you will be very surprised at what can be observed.
-- Edited by Timewarp on Sunday 24th of January 2016 01:53:40 PM