Yes Macten, when I originally explored the image and tested it in the negative I thought it was a crater as well. But then I thought if it is a crater there should be a shadow cast. The peculiar thing about this particular anomaly is that the sun would appear to be striking all of the anomalous object without the usual form of shadow showing. There are many block-type objects and many of them are grouped closely together. Could it possibly be that these objects are geological formations? With many of the lunar images the finding of a tower or tall thin object will usually be accompanied by some type of rectilinear formation at its base.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Reguarding the object I identified as a possible craft. I recind that after looking at the negative more intensely. The round object appears to be a crater that extends into the larger one causing a V shape down its side and the bright horizontal lines are merely the large crater rim. There are some box shapes that appear more in the positive than the negative that look a bit like containers but that does not hold true with the negative. Just a trick of the eye.
Sometimes one wants to belive something to the point of unconciosly seeing things "differently" than what they are. There are, however, other structures in the photo that are not so easily explained.
Hi Timewarp regarding location. Forgive me if I'm wrong but in your original image I believe the crater in the foreground with the central peak is Moretus. See my slide. Hope it helps to locate your anomaly.
I have made a positive of it and have increased the contrast and brightness and have used the unsharp filter to improve edge definition.
I have enclosed some of the areas in rectangles with some of the main features of interest rectangled in red.
If anyone says there's nothing on the moon except rocks and redundant mission hardware, tell them to take a concentrated look at the images in this thread.
My personal opinion is that there are many structural formations and other features showing with many signs of artificiality all over the terrain.
Can these shapes be interpreted as being large rocks?
goggog, I am still in the process of trying to locate the original location of the image.
I was sure at the time I downloaded it the view was used as the background image for a phys.org web page as I have bookmarked the site.
Since uploading the image to the forum the background image used on the site in question has mysteriously disappeared.
I am still searching for the image as the resolution is much better than what we normally have to deal with.
I suspect that the image may be a view from a previous Chang'e orbital mission but I could be wrong. Any thoughts on this from other members would be helpful.
Macten, Thank you for your input and for highlighting of the circular object. Your work is much appreciated.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Timewarp, take a close look at the 0bject you circled. It might not be on the surface. It could very well be orbiting as it looks like a ship or craft of some type.
During the Apollo 11 mission, both Armstrong and Aldrin said they saw two large spacecraft on the edge of the crater.
Well, take a look at this circular object which can be seen to the right in the main image above. Also, note the other detail showing in the image.
Unfortunately, I am at a loss to locate the original image but I suspect that it may be a capture from a previous Chang'e orbital mission.
Anyway, if we had images of this kind of quality to observe I am sure we would find a huge amount of very interesting object detail on the lunar surface.
All that is there now at the link you gave is a rover travel map which looks nothing like this. Are you sure you got the link correct? They may well have changed it of course.