Alien Anomalies

Well said V/          -Morbius

viejob wrote:

---

I MAY NOT NOTICE EVERYTHING RIGHT AWAY, BUT I CANNOT FIND ANY BUILDINGS OR HUMANS WITH HATS OR HEADBANDS? WERE THESE PHOTOS FOR FUN OR ARE YOU SERIOUS AND CAN SEE BUILDINGS AND HUMANS? I AM LOOKING IN THE SPOTS THAT INDICATE THESE ANOMALIES WITH CIRCLES AND ARROWS , BUT STILL CANNOT FIND THEM.DO OTHER PEOPLE NOTICE THESE ANOMALIES?

---

Nope, viejob, not everyone sees what someone else may see in the variousness of rock formations. There are a lot of "rocks" on Mars, and they are of every imaginable shape. Just one of the things that makes it a little dificult for us, is, there is no way to even make a guess at size most of the time, with these photos. Often, with the rover pics sometimes being taken at not much over "arms length", rocks only an inch or two in size can appear as huge boulders. So, closeness/distance to the camera can cause misconception in what we think we are seeing, for the "shapes" we see.  

There are many anomalies to be found/have been found, in the multitude of Mars surface pics, from the Rover cameras, and from the Mars Orbiter cameras. Many such anomalies are strongly indicative of intelligent design, and civilized life.   

So, expect to see posts, suggesting possible anomalies, which you may never see. Also expect to see posts suggesting anomalies which you can immediately see, and can confirm to your self the fact of the anomaly.

In my anomaly searching, I don't look for rocks that might look like anomalies, I look for anomalies in amongst the rocks. 

The more you look the more you will find, and you can post for us to see!! Be sure to use the best possible photos (ie, not Google Mars)

A concise and well written reply viejob, with some quite apt questions too. First though, I need say ... no viejob, you won't notice everything  ' right away ', these anomalies are near elusive at times, and most of us here will quite often have identification problems with our finds. However, don't be discouraged, give a few weeks or so, watch how others approach and identify problematic areas and resolve them, or not, ask questions too. You will find your visual perception, and discernment, improving over time .. and familiarity quickens this process. So practice, it will come to you ... and enjoy.

For this latter, am attaching a further enhanced sample, the guy with the hat, for you to study , then go back and compare it with the original submission. You will begin to see the slight variations in shading, and detail becomes clearer. And yes, I am quite serious about identifying and explaining, best I can, ' anomalies '.

If you want to post, pick out your best shot. I know your written description will be no problem. regards    -Morbius

really! Would you like to meet him ?/ha .. thanks for the reply Levelwind. Am finishing quite an interesting post on the same picture .. stay tuned!       -Morbius

Iceman, I can definitely see some geometric shapes and some mechanical looking debris in these images.

Morbius, I cannot see any of the figures you are referring to in the last few images ? I can see the 'girl on rock' which is interesting but needs to be confirmed with another image from a slightly different angle or time to confirm the anomaly.

Because of how much is to see in the original picture I took some screenshots so that others can tackle it, but it requires substantial training to realize how much is to see in these images.

In my research of the images from Mars, I have found that the subject is dissolved into pieces and then put back together and fill in the gaps in a number of ways. Here are some examples of how this method is applied. I try to move things in the original realative position.

Source: image below.

Hello, ICEMAN.

There is something that i noticed also on this same picture . Something that doesnt look to fit with all the things around. Looks like a rectangular shadow or hole.

Here it is: