Thank you for your kindness of providing them to me. I very much agree that they show "interesting activity". Having been shown, by Skipper, dozens of instances of "smudging", I suspect that I have just seen a few more.
Smudging:
The topic of "smudging" tangentaly leads to the topic of secrecy, and the motives for secrecy. As to the motives, I personally found it helpful to contemplate the ideas about "3 ladders of society" as espoused by Michael O. Church at https://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2012/09/09/the-3-ladder-system-of-social-class-in-the-u-s/ Although his ideas are not perfect, they were nevertheless helpful to me in that I was finally able to comprehend the worldview of what he calls "Elite 1". It seems to me that these are the same people whom have been called, elsewhere, the TPTB. As is the case with most swords, this one is somewhat double-edged in that it shows the extent to which a person is entrenched in their particular worldview which is associated with their rung on a particular ladder of society. That is to say, it would be a cold day in Hell before an E-1 would change his/her worldview. To the extent that is true, it does not bode well for Skipper's Planetary Truth Project, however much I like the idea of truth. Sigh.
Yes, I believe that I also noticed that strangeness. I have no idea how such a taper could be made by the tracks of a crawling machine. Now, if the "tracks" were to consist instead of sheets of material, such as, say steel; then the machine, that were to be inserting such sheets endwise into the ground, could be making them progressively shorter and narrower, and that might look like the taper that we see. But that "answer" causes yet another question: why did the trail taper to an end? Why not just end? What is the requirement that it taper? This situation, IMO, deserves the use of that phrase made famous by the lady reporter, whose name escapes me, who wrote a book called "High Strangeness". So now it's "Deep Strangeness"?
Altered images?
Skipper provided more than one instance which conclusively showed that somebody altered some of the images which are displayed in Google Earth. So we need to consider that possibility to be a probabilty in the case of an anomaly which is displayed in Google Earth, yes?
Yes, there are so many twists and turns in those tracks that it seems improbable that they are strip mining. Particularly as they go around in circles and back on themselves which would not make sense if it was that. The end of some of these tracks are interesting. One I have seen tapers to a point and then stops.
I do not see how it can be something which Google has done to the satellite image, or what it could achieve it it IS something they have done to the image. As Skipper says, it looks as if these marks are "on the ground" but the fact that they are there irrespective of surface features should ring a warning bell for us that they are not really there - perhaps. I do not see how something, however large, could continue over mountains or surface features many thousands of metres high. That is the one thing which makes me doubt whether it is 'real' or not.
There are still some areas which obviously are obscured as it is possible to see structures at the edge of these areas, so I cannot think what is going on...either in Google Maps/Earth or on the surface.
Well, they did not show anything in Google Maps, after clicking on Satellite, and they did not show anything in Google Earth either; but I have a dial-up connection which routinely does not finish downloading pages from the web, and views from Google Earth. So I am willing to suppose that they showed some anomaly to you, or anybody else. A kml file might work in Google Earth; so please feel free to attach it to a reply here.
Skipper has provided links to the NASA evidence which shows that mining is underway in the solar system, as we speak. On that basis alone, the tracks on the ocean floor are more likely, as you say, to be mining than to be anything else. Notwithstanding that probability, the tracks might be something else because the tracks are sometimes inconsistent with strip mining. The inconsistency is seen when there are two parallel tracks, then the area between them seems to be undisturbed in that there is no pattern of "railroad ties" or "crawler tracks" in that area. Would a strip mining machine leave a strip unmined between two strips that were mined? The most probable answer would be that it would not leave it unmined; so if the area between the tracks was mined, then it was mined by suction hoses mounted on booms which projected from both sides of the strip mining machine, and the waste was likewise deposited back by hoses mounted on two additional booms which projected from both sides of the strip mining machine. We use a double boom system, for deliberately depositing what was dredged to both sides of the area that was dredged, on some of our dredges which dredge the Mississippi River. So the mere exsistence of a seemingly undisturbed area between two tracks is not definitive proof that the area was not mined. At the most, the seemingly undisturbed area between the tracks opens the door to the possibility that the area was indeed not mined. If not mined, then we must look for other reasons to use a machine that leaves tracks five miles wide. If the reason for the tracks was not mining, and the reason for the tracks was not stitching a tear, a trench, then I am at a loss to imagine what else it might have been for. So if anybody has another alternative, please mention it.
Unfortunately, the ice is melting NOT growing, so there will be less weight to throw the Earth off course. So, until the ice starts to grow again, we are safe from this theory anyway.
The point is that it appears the aliens are still in the deep oceans and in antarctica too. There is evidence from Skipper and we have found evidence on this forum that there are aliens in antarctica. Now... if this is the case and they may be in other remote areas of the world too, it could well be that they are living here and have been for ages. There are reports of undersea ufos coming and going and we have an image of what could possibly be the entrance to at least one antarctic base.
How would this absolutely giant sewing machine 'knit' the two sides of a tear in the earth's crust together? With a giant needle? What would they use for thread? How deep would this thread need to go to hold it all together? Come on, which is more likely - a giant sewing machine with giant needle and giant thread, making huge stitches in the Earth's crust - or a giant mining machine?
I am not saying Skipper is correct, but it is one fairly plausible explanation and we do have evidence that aliens are interested in mining on asteroids too, so they obviously are in that kind of business around our neck of the woods.
If you dont believe me about the aliens still here and in our ocean depths, you may want to look at coordinates 31.95508N, 133.79425E as there appears to be some kind of machinery in that area. (enter this into Google Maps search box)
Wonderful questions. Unfortunately, I do not have equally wonderful answers. I would therefore hope that we would somehow receive some answers from the maker of those tracks, regardless of their purpose. As to being pretty far gone, that might be our situation, if http://www.habtheory.com/1/101.php is correct.
One way to summarize that site would be to say that the crust of the Earth will slide on the molten magma because the polar ice caps will eventually grow so large that they will pull the crust over the magma when the centrifigal force becomes large enough because the ice cap on Greenland is off-center and so is the ice cap on Anartica. Furthermore, the site claims that the next slide will not be the first slide. Hence the possibility for the need to repair some tears in the crust, which tears were made during previous slides of the crust over the magma. So the fact that some of the tracks cross a crevice, instead of parallel a crevice, might be evidence that the tracks are sutures, yes?
So, the aliens are in fact patching up the old Earth's body and not plundering it? Is that what you are saying? Somehow, I dont think they would do it that way since I think that once the need arises for the earth to be patched up in that way, then we are pretty far gone - dont you think?
Besides... some of those sewing runs are hardly straight and they dont all follow cracks/rifts in the surface either with twists and turns and overlaps. Why would they do that when patching up?
Although I agree with all of the other interpretations of all of the other anomalies which Skipper has mentioned, I would suggest that the "strip-mining tracks" are instead "sutures". That is to say that the tube or pipe which appears to be in the middle of the five-mile-wide path of "railroad ties" is a bundle of carbon nano-tubes which prevent the rift from spreading. So the machine which makes the track is more correctly called a "sewing machine" than a "strip-miner".