Alien Anomalies

goggog · Teaching the truth

Аномальные зоны появляются два раза в МРО Карту, но с Разными координатами

The Genealogist · Veteran Member

Anomalous Areas appear twice in LRO Map but with Different Co-ordinates

The Genealogist · Veteran Member

Hi TW thanks for that.

Please forgive me but I know the black stripes are 'stitching' edges but what confuses me (as a layman)....why does Arizona have to do duplicate areas and add sections to bring the surface photos together.

ie

1. Stitch together areas of the identical terrain which have different co-ordinates and therefore one of them is wrong from the outset

and

2. Add slices or sections of the duplicated terrain into the image as well. This is where I feel it could be used to disguise or hide areas if indeed (as some believe) this is being done. Why not have 1 black line at least instead of the 2. Whats the point when its of a duplicated area anyway?

If you have answered this in your comments TW or in your links then I apologise...Im a novice at this and just dont understand where or why there is a need to do both especially without flagging this up on the image.

-- Edited by The Genealogist on Wednesday 24th of October 2012 05:04:01 PM

The Genealogist · Veteran Member

I've decided to add a 5th slide to the posting below because the object contained within will be found by observers looking for the anomalies below in the LRO Quick map. I dont think I could really leave this one out as it again adds weight to the fact that it is difficult to know what we are really looking at. The anomaly in qustion would be lovely if it were true but its equivalent to the right of it (on the same map with different co-ordinates) looks nothing like it from the angle it has been taken. Locations provided on the image and arrows provided for reference.

The Genealogist · Veteran Member

This is only my second posting to this thread, but I feel it is an important step in showing the difficulty in deciphering the image material offered up by the ASU.

In the first slide there appears to be an anomaly very close to the black edge of the image frame. In 'slide 2' I show that this anomaly appears on the same map just to the right of it with but with different co-ordinates. This image is very blurred but not so blurred that it can be seen the object looks nothing like its counterpart.

In 'slide 3' I show an aerial shot of a nearby location which demonstrates that not only do areas appear twice but where an entire section (insert) has been placed 2 heavy strips of black add to the inaccuracy of the map. If the right and left images are the same anyway why was it necessary to add a strip in the middle. Why not just extend one image into the other? Does it hide something which would be seen when comparing right with left? Is the anomaly in slide one and example of what has been hidden? Was this missed?

In the 4th slide I again compare the 2 boxed areas in slide 3 which hardly look alike.

Now I realise that steps have to be taken to bring images together on the map but there better ways of doing it surely.

Observations welcome. Locations are contained within the images.

Why is it necessary to add an insert to join 2 images which are the same anyway. Why not just extend one image into the other?

Note the coil like structure on the lowe left image in slide 4.