"Thank you rdunk, looking at the later sol images I would say that your anomalies may just be out of place rocks, but as has been pointed out by goggog and timewarp there are other anomalies in the surrounding area to concider.
Also thank you for posting the nivnac link, the site has some very useful images"
Thanks Xenon! I am just not sure why it is so hard for those animal-looking objects to be seen as something other than rocks. They look nothing like rocks, IMO. Now, in the anomalies that timewarp posted below, in a few of his rings, I can make out something different, but mostly, I just see rocks - except for the one animal-looking feature he left ringed.
Xenon, how active are the debunkers here at the Alien Anomalies forum?? As I am fairly new here, and this forum is not very active, it will take a while to get to know everyone. I do have several other anomalies to post, and will post them as I can. However, I have posted some anomalies here that received hardly anycomments, and I thought they were some of the best evidence of artificial design I had seem. Is the group here really that small, or would there be other reasons, for such few/or no comments at times?
Hi rdunk
Experience has shown how ordinary geology can look like anomalous objects, the animals in question do look out of place, but in light of the other sol images taken at different angles it seems to show they are rocks, (however this analogy could be wrong), we do try to be as objective and open-minded as possible, even though we are finding thousands of anomalous objects and signs of life, we have to understand that Mars does now have a hostile alien environment, and most (not all) anomalies seem to be ancient relics from a time before catastrophe hit and the planet was much more hospitable, any surface life forms may now be evolving to the present climate and may use shell or rock type covering to protect from the harmful UV that hits the surface, but it make sense that any intelligent life would be based below ground (see my post in the "Imagine" thread).
I can understand your concern about debunkers as we have had our share of them over the past two years, but as has been stated, this site is a safe environment to post evidence without fear and ridicule, the debunkers and those sent to distract are filtered out to prevent further disruption, but we must all be prepared to have our findings scrutinised by the community and accept objective criticism or support, remember some members do have scientific backgrounds, and some have been researching anomalous topics most of their adult life, so please don't take offence if others do not always agree with your evidence.
This forum was reopened to allow visitors from Mr Skippers guest book to discuss and post anomalous evidence, we also set up a base for the Planetary Truth Project, and the forum was very active until May this year, unfortunately some of the founders now have other projects that keeps them from posting, but like Mr Skippers guest book this site has evolved so we get far more visitors than posters who come to view the latest evidence (and archives) now averaging about 85, 000 genuine viewers per month (Total views to date...1,134,116), so the evidence does get looked at and even commented on at other sites.
I hope this post helps allay your concerns about this site, please feel free to PM or email me with anymore concerns as we do need to stay on topic.
Xenon
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"
"Thank you rdunk, looking at the later sol images I would say that your anomalies may just be out of place rocks, but as has been pointed out by goggog and timewarp there are other anomalies in the surrounding area to concider.
Also thank you for posting the nivnac link, the site has some very useful images"
Thanks Xenon! I am just not sure why it is so hard for those animal-looking objects to be seen as something other than rocks. They look nothing like rocks, IMO. Now, in the anomalies that timewarp posted below, in a few of his rings, I can make out something different, but mostly, I just see rocks - except for the one animal-looking feature he left ringed.
Xenon, how active are the debunkers here at the Alien Anomalies forum?? As I am fairly new here, and this forum is not very active, it will take a while to get to know everyone. I do have several other anomalies to post, and will post them as I can. However, I have posted some anomalies here that received hardly anycomments, and I thought they were some of the best evidence of artificial design I had seem. Is the group here really that small, or would there be other reasons, for such few/or no comments at times?
Thank you rdunk, looking at the later sol images I would say that your anomalies may just be out of place rocks, but as has been pointed out by goggog and timewarp there are other anomalies in the surrounding area to concider.
Also thank you for posting the nivnac link, the site has some very useful images
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"
rdunk, I do not see any animals in your featured image but there are plenty of other interesting anomalies. The image shown below is from sol 2140. This image is full size 1024 which I have reduced to 1000 pixels wide. The area of interest shown in your image is in the lower right-hand corner.
Three images are shown here, the first of which shows the original view. The second image shows some of the more prominent anomalies which I have 'ringed'.
Take note of the anomaly highlighted and 'ringed' in green. The third image is a closeup view of this particular anomaly.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Maybe it is my conditioning that stops me, but all I see is rock formations (and a facial representation further left in the original image), but what has surprised me is the difference in quality of the images, rdunk's images are much sharper and show more detail than the original pixilated sol 2139 images.
rdunk can you tell us how you got your images so clear, and can someone please point out the animals.
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"
do you mean the "animal" at the top left of those images? If so, could you post a closer enlargement please? I have a feeling they may turn out to be rocks.
I have thought that I found animals in the past. Worms somewhere I cannot find at the moment, I thought I found a cat-like animal too. see biological Evidence forum for more.
I am posting what appear to be two animals in a Mars Rover Opportunity photo. Because of difference in size, I would just assume one is an adult, and one is a "cub"(?). When I saw these, at first, I thought they were alive, because the adult is looking straight toward the Rover camera. But, after having found them, in the same place and position on several different Rover Sol day photos, they must be lifeless forms, resulting from taxidermy, or could just be another type of fabricated statues. The bodies are completely covered with fur or something else. One can just see that the lowest part of the back leg looks bare. The front leg areas look very full and wide, by comparison.
These anomalies/animals can be seen in Rover Opportunity Nav Cam photos Sol day 2138, and they can be seen in Rover Opportunity Panoramic Cam photos Sol days 2139, 2140, and 2143 (and probably others).
For FYI, i will post a link to a Rover Opportunity Panoramic camera Sol day 2139 photo.