Alien Anomalies

References, references please

Here is the same view as above showing a little more of the terrain.

I have circled many of the features and have added two arrows pointing to what appears to be a long structure. The arrow lto the ower left is pointing to the block structure seen in the previous image.

My apologies for the number of circles used but this is the only way to highlight the many features.

ICEMAN, The angle at which the view was taken, to me, would appear to be normal.

The view of the chasma that I posted above is an enhanced view of the original ESA tiff. Shown below is a closeup of the bottom left-hand corner of the scene.

A great deal of my research in the past has been concerned with the number of anthropormorphic shapes that can be seen in many of the images from Mars. I have established that the formation of these recognizable facial shapes plays a major part in martian cultural identity. Also, many of the shapes would appear to be in their own likeness and plenty can be observed in the image shown below.

Could it possibly be that the martian 'people' may be telling us something by building many of their structures in thi manner?

Have a look at the cropped view shown below and I think you will agree from viewing the image that there is lot more to Mars than what NASA, ESA and other scientific institutions are telling us about. What you can see in this image shows that there is definitely life on the planet and the beings have a high degree of intelligence. 

If you look at the lower left area of the image a definite structure can be seen with an anthropormophic shape (head and face) forming the centre part of the structure. There are also many other structures showing in this closeup view but you may have to zoom in slightly to recognize them.

I have processed this image in Photoshop to show up the surface detail.

Some of the features I have circled. Note the structures and anthropological features.

The resolution of this image is given as being 19m/pixel therefore some of the structures that can be observed have to be quite large.

As I read, the liquid like substance has been discovered to be sand?

It is better to make an effort, and find out you are wrong, than to ignore posting the report, only to find out later it was true.

I support independent verification to take photographic evidence of mars, NO ESA OR NASA. RUN BY THE PUBLIC IN TRANSPARENCY NO MANIPULATION OF SCIENCE DATA NO SECRECY.

If I could program a 2D java environment 7 years ago, I am sure others who have experience in 3D could RENDER entire planetary environments. Just a wild theory not worth any serious consideration I think, but worth thinking of all possibilities.

It is just photos of mars, video games today have better looking clearer environments. I almost can't believe how realistic everything is getting, considering the progress of technology being trickle fed to the public. I don't even play video games anymore. If Hollywood can make movies look like they are shot on site, is it worth considering the same for mars maybe?