This, to me, highlights a serious issue in modern astrophysics, and why it fails to explain 90% of what we observe: It is based on the delusion that only gravity is at work in the Universe, and that it is far stronger than it actually is. So-called "scientists" try to say that they know way more about how the Universe works than anyone else, than people before Einstein. But in reality, we know less than we did before Einstein. Einstein basically changed popular science from real science to a mathematician's wonderland, getting rid of all relation to the real world and how it works. Ptolemaic epicycles. Way to keep adding them by patching up your failing theories with non-falsifiable, unbased hypothetical objects, matter, energy, and forces, through mathematics. Just because I can make a computer game that looks like real life does not mean that when you zoom in on the game and see textures and pixels that the real world also has extures and pixels.
__________________
What if Pinnochio says that his nose will grow longer?
A hundred years ago astronomers assumed that any body larger than an asteroid would be constrained by gravity to a spherical shape. But as telescopes got better, reality intruded.
Planetary nebulae in particular, now thought to be the final explosive stage of large stars, fail to live up to spherical expectations. Over 60 years ago, Dr Charles Bruce, of the Electrical Research Association in England, began to note the similarities between planetary nebulae and electrical discharge phenomena. In this Hubble Telescope image of the planetary nebula known as the Bug Nebula, you can see many examples of these electrical characteristics. The overall shape is an hourglass, not a sphere. The central star is hidden by a dark dust torus. The light of the star is rich in ultraviolet, one of the signatures of electric discharge. And the shapes within the nebula mimic the twisted filaments, spirals and pillars typical of electrical discharge in plasmas.
Plasmas in the lab form cellular structures separated by thin layers of opposite charge called double layers. Does the same thing happen in nebulas? That's a tough question to answer, because the only known way detect a double layer is to send a probe through it, and nebulas are far beyond the reach of our spacecraft. But everywhere we've sent probes in our solar system, we've found cellular structures separated by double layers, just as we found in the plasma lab. We call these structures magnetospheres, magnetotails, bow shocks, comet heads and tails.
Hannes Alfvén says, "... it is unpleasant to base far-reaching conclusions on the existence of a structure which we cannot detect directly. But the alternative is to draw far-reaching conclusions from the assumption that in distant regions, the plasmas have properties which are drastically different from what they are in our own neighborhood. This is obviously far more unpleasant ... " Although the answers are not yet known, Electric Universe researchers begin by assuming that the behavior of plasma will be the same whether you encounter it in the plasma lab or in a far-away stellar formation like the Bug Nebula. And that assumption offers a whole new viewpoint for the universe we live in.
__________________
What if Pinnochio says that his nose will grow longer?
