This image is 3d-ified by which I mean it is highly processed, so I think the first thing we probably need to do is to find another image of the same area without all the processing.
This will allow us to examine the photo and see what is "really" there. Maybe the 3d software threw up a glitch or maybe it is really there.
One of the things I have learned is that we need as many different views as possible to a) confirm that it is really one the surface and b) confirm that different views may reveal different lighting conditions at the time the satellite photographed the area and therefore provide us with a different interpretation.
I realise this area is very large and it may be like looking for a needle in a haystack, but we have to try, in order to answer some basic questions from skeptics.
It show buildings around a main tower. This must have been built by someone - or have been implanted in the original picture for whatever purpose. Can someone please explain this "anomaly"?