Alien Anomalies

Perhaps a man or woman would thrive to the top solely IOT (in order to) disclose something that would have scientific backing...for now.?!<>>? just a thought

that is an interesting question... I guess that one of them will tell you that it is one of us :P

When people join the forum, they normally want to post things that they have found and to share these anomalies with the forum community, so when someone joins who does not act in a 'normal' way, they have to expect some different reaction.

Part of this reaction often involves prompting them to make a post showing an anomaly and pushing them to say that they consider intelligent design is behind what they see. This kind of post shows that they are willing to fully engage with the forum community and, like I mentioned above, means that they have committed themselves as someone who does not believe what the media tells us.

In my experience, there are 3 types of people who come here. One fully engages and wants to share their own finds, the next does not create an account but just comes to read the posts for their own amusement and enjoyment. The last kind is the person who joins for whatever reason but never fully commits to the forum community.

Occasionally, this last type sometimes also wants to be a help and guiding light towards a more scientifically focused way of showing anomalies. This in itself is fine, and if it is genuine, shows a kindness and need to be of service to our fellow man. That is laudable.

This type of person often makes comments of a general nature but nothing specific about the anomaly being discussed. Many times they do not offer their own opinion but prefer to discuss things academically and more objectively rather than subjectively offering their own interpretation of what is shown in the specific thread.

Now, this may be a scientific personality characteristic, I dont know, but it is rather unusual behaviour - given that no-one is forcing them to come here and that I am assuming that this subject is an interest of theirs.

Unfortunately, it does not achieve these stated objectives if answers to posts are of a general and non-specific nature. Forum members want to see others who are like them and who are genuinely interested in finding anomalies. Talking about generalities in an image or discussing the qualities of sand dunes as a landscape feature is not a way to endear ourself to the forum community. Particularly if we want to gain authority and respect from other members, this will only serve to lower their opinion of us and mark us as a 'waffler', someone who does not address the points raised in a direct and useful manner. 

Surely, the way to us becoming a helping and guiding light is to post our own anomalies giving examples of a more scientific approach and showing that we are similarly genuinely interested in searching for anomalies and revealing them to the forum community. 

What we really need to see from everyone, and something which a government agent would probably never do, is to post an anomaly which we, ourselves had found. This has to be accompanied with an interpretation or a speculation which affirms publicly that there is intelligence behind the anomaly. 

Posting an image for general discussion is sometimes useful, but is not helpful in engaging in the forum. This is because it is not placing our own personal interpretation on anomalies found, but rather is an impersonal and academic way to approach anomaly-hunting.

A government agent would probably post an ambiguous image, something which could be interpreted as an anomaly but they would never actually speculate that the anomaly was of intelligent design. There are a number of posts on here already which illustrate these points.

One last thing to remember, most of us make occasional gaffs and mistakes by posting something which the others can show is a normal feature of the landscape or an artifact of the image. This helps to show genuine enthusiasm for the subject, and shows that occasional mistakes are a natural occurrance in this investigation 'work'.