The first one you posted as I said in the thread, does look as if it is something strange, and since it is in quite a few different photos, I feel that it must have been worth the astronauts taking a picture of the structure.
I believe there are constructs on other planets etc that are not as solid as we would have made them - maybe even energy constructs?
I agree that OBrien's explanation seems logical, but to me, but I dont want to believe that. Maybe we can find other photos of the same areas and see if they show something or if they support what he says and his explanation. This is the proper way to determine if something we suspect is on the ground is acually real or imaginary.
We all make mistakes because we are enthusiastic anomaly hunters and sometimes our enthusiasm overtakes us. No problem.
Thanks O'brien and qmantoo I made a rookie mistake, I know what the rilles are from the angle on the picture it looked like it casted a shadow. I don't mind criticism, I appreciate it so that it helps me get better and I learn. Cheers, and I promise all no more bridge posts from me.
Oh dear.... I am not sure you will be looking forward to my views since this looks to me as if it is what they call a rille. Now, having said that, it may be caused by something else - other than the natural geological formation that they say a rille is, but anyway, I cannot see a bridge. Sorry to say.
At the top left of your red rectangle there is an 'S' shaped thing which is strange and there are other bits and pieces in the foreground around the crater however. I will find the name of the crater so you can search for other photos of the area.
From the new program I am developing here are the features within this vicinity. I may have missed some out.
AS10-32-4856 - 0.3° N / 2.5° E
satellite Reaumur D at (0.00N, 2.50E) satellite Rhaeticus J at (0.00N, 2.50E) satellite Rhaeticus L at (0.00N, 2.50E) satellite Rhaeticus M at (0.00N, 2.50E) crater Blagg at (1.00N, 2.50E) sinus Medii at (1.00N, 2.50E)
Oh, and I will just add, that just because others do not agree with you does not mean you are wrong. It just means that your views have not been accepted by some of us complete non-scientists. Like some real scientists did in 1999 or before, you may have found the 'water' on the Moon and it will take 20 years before your findings are confirmed.
-- Edited by qmantoo on Monday 3rd of January 2011 02:19:11 PM
The last time I posted an image of a "bridge" it was determined to be glare. Well I am not sure how glare would cast a shadow so that means this is either an extremely long bridge or some kind of smoke stream. I look forward to everyone's views.
Edited to insert image
-- Edited by Chandre on Monday 3rd of January 2011 12:56:54 PM