Alien Anomalies

ol, thanks for the vids frutty, watched all 8.



wasn't aware of the 3rd phenom stubbs found.

all that debris, ice crystal, flush water, astro poop, dust and lens flare bs is getting old.

i've seen some sts vids with all kinds of stuff, like pairs of "meteors" zipping by. wtf!

i wonder though, how local these critters are. are they part of the earths eco-mag system or space faring things.

i would assume the former, myself.

Thanks gbull, pm me for my account so you can transfer the bucks. lol

The extraterrestrial energyzoa hypothesis (ETZH) is and alternative hypothesis of the extraterrestrial hypothesis, that some of the UFO phenomena is best explained as being some kind of biological lifeforms and not creatures from other planets occupying physical spacecraft visiting Earth. The issue has already been a matter of discussion in astrobilological speculation known as the atmospheric beast hypothesis.

The hypothesis relating certain kind of UFO phenomenon to biological hydrozoa behavior was first formulated by Daniel Tarr [1] in 2006 and has not been accurately explored by the scientific community yet, and many organizations still have to engage in the study of UFO sightings and contact reports in relation to the extraterrestrial energyzoa hypothesis.

source: http://www.roswellrods.com/tjc1.html

Rods and critters have been studied in depth by several people. Escamilla is probably a scammer, but he wasn't even the discoverer of the phenomenom. But the phenomenom has been recorded by several other researchers.

Also see everything you can about Martin Stubbs. He's somebody with the qualified background, who has studied and classifi3ed these creatures at length.


-- Frutty

frutty, rods are dubious and have been proven hoaxy stuff.

bugs. whatever.

jose whatshisname.

the other thing, i don't know. i'll pay you the $100 when it eats me.

-- Frutty

Have you heard about "rods"?

We have all seen evidence of aliens living in climates which would be challenging for humans. For example on asteroids, but of course also on Mars and the Moon too. These places MAY not have much atmosphere, much oxygen, much water, etc which makes them pretty inhospitable for us, but they do not have to be inhospitable for aliens with a different kind of biology.

If they can survive quite happily in freezing cold temperatures out in space, they could easily exist in the Antarctic which is the topic of Mr Skipper's last report. They could also exists in other cold places like at the bottom of the sea on high up in the mountains too. There have been reports of alien bases on Earth too.

These cold places are the last places we would go to because they are so inhospitable to us, and so there could easily be colonies of aliens living there - simply because we never, or very rarely, go there. It may also explain why some humans have disappeared when trekking in unexplored places.

Also, if they have different biology to us, they may have gills which allows them to live underwater and historically, may be what old sailors used to call mermaids - humans with fish tails. They may also not have red blood either because of the cold temperatures, they may have a substance likened to anti-freeze in their fluids. It has been found in fish that live at the bottom of the sea, so why not aliens too.

Actually, what ARE aliens? Aren't they only beings with intelligence that may look different from us and possibly more like some of our Earthly insects, reptiles or animals? The missing ingredient then is intelligence, but how do you measure intelligence which also encompasses alien intelligence on the scale ?