Alien Anomalies

I was thinking on a very primative scale. Something along the line of mulitple lenses, and a series of PVC plumbing pipe, thick and heavy duty. I was thinking of going to the pawn shop and buy this 30$ telescope they have and dismantling it to see how it functions, and just improvising with cheap materials (for the blunt of it at least). Then maybe a 5 to 8 lens mulit-magnified. Right now, i have no idea what im really talking about or getting into, the idea is crude at this point, but your idea sounds awesome as well.

wow, both of you posted some good stuff.  And yes i know of mr. walson, his videos blow me away. At least they did. I have a funny feeling that ill never be able to afford what it is that i want. I want something even more powerful than whats available on the open market. I saw some hubble pics last night... and honestly the pictures looked way to good to be real. I mean FLAWLESS IMAGING. They could definetly zoom in on a hair on the surface of the moon if they wanted. No need to send anything there. We could scan the face of the moon constantly for movement etc. And have a super high powered probe on the darkside. That one russian photo showing that massive tower or whatever the hell it was, was honestly shocking to me. It literally hangs off the edge of the planet. Im not quite sure of its figures, but i know it has to be HUGE. I want to see that **** up close and not a blurry smudge edited tampered version of what it really is. I have even thought of trying to develop my own telescope without capped limitations. If i could cunstruct such a device, im sure someone would stop me from generating the patton. It seems like they will sell you  awesome scopes, but nothing full capable of exposing the truth. I saw some of the videos after i posted last night and looked at telescopes and honestly. Someone spent 6k on a telescope that still did not achieve what im out for. It was close but got blurry. He did show some weird stuff however. And fruit you know your a genius, ive came to your defense before because i know what your capable of. And you have always worked hard on the scraps you have been given. No one should ever try and knock you for that. I found what was said to you by some of the other poster's to be disrespectful and tastless. You rock bro. Anyways.. anyone know anything of the basic concept on constructing a telescope? They did it back in the day. I would just keep working on it till i mastered it and had a homemade awesome scope! Or could buy a cheap one and just see what i can get out of it. Thanks alot for the comments this is all hell of interesting to me, and like i said before i hardly post unless its important to me. And as far as the belt, i feel that only humans cannot survive. Devices could, but they would definetly have to be built better than what ive seen thus far. I am pretty confident none of us "humans" are on the moon but i do believe we probably have probes..rovers etc etc there probably working hard on a regular basis. And i feel like mars was nasa's way of saying "We beat you all there again". Nasa should change their hyphen to FITYMI=Fake It Till You Make It   thanks guys
peace
iLLUMiNATiON

Sorry for the mistake.
Obviously Mr. Walson scanned the surface of the Moon, not the surface of Mars.

New York Herald Tribune science editor John J. O’Neill on July 29, 1953,claimed to have seen a 12-mile-long “bridge” straddling Mare Crisium. After reporting his find to the Association of Lunar and Planetary Observers, O’Neill was scorned by astronomers. However, a month later, the “bridge” was confirmed by British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens, who told the BBC, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence." Further confirmation came from Patrick Moore of the British Astronomical Association, who declared the “bridge” had “popped up” almost overnight. and we have the Apollo photos to "prove" it too, but no-one wants to find out about it. shame on them.

This may be a stupid question to some, but I wonder is there a specific telescope i can buy on a budget that can show the moon in great detail? I mean maybe not as good as seeing a fly on a rock but maybe if there was a 6ft tall person walking? My friend tells me there are high powered telescopes that are pretty stable and can view the moon at an incredible amount of detail and distance. But i dont know if he know's exactly what im trying to accomplish. What id like to do is literally comb the surface, at least the surface i have access to, inch by inch and maybe catalog strange events in like a notebook or something along those lines. Is this possible? I have a feeling its not or we would have TONS more to work with. Thats my dream right there. I talk about it constantly and if possible would do anything to make this happen. I had a 100.00 telescope from walmart. I could see the moon pretty sharp. But definetly couldnt zoom in. It would get too blurry to make anything out. The answer to this question could literally be heart breaking to me LOL. However, I am serious.

I agree with you, THE MOON IS DEFINETLY STRANGE! This weird plain grey dead looking rock...yet with so much life and mystery. Ive seen things that look like pyramids, roads, bridges, bubbles, fires etc etc etc... yet its a grey dead planet? I think whatever is there was designed to adapt to the conditions. The biggest wish i think i have.. is that i wish i had a super telescope that could zoom all the way to the surface to even see a tiny pebble, and i would invest my days and nights monitoring the so called dead moon. And would find out for myself...but then again..zooming that far away on a pebber would be so wobbly and out of control id probably puke... i still can wish haha.. thank for the reply my brother.