AS the french astronomer states in the image below that the photograph has been inverted for better viewing (I don't agree but it was his opinion, and consequently we must adhere to it).
I extracted the clip from Tycho and inverted it. Further I enhanced its contrast, DOUBLED THE CLIP SIZE, and painted it light greenish.
This is as good as is gets.
Considering Tycho to about 85 km (53 miles) across, with a depth of 4.8 km, the towers and structures inside the circle must be mega hyper gargantuan!
Story goes Archimedes was flooded with lava blah blah blah years ago, and consequently no features stand out. I hope This animation shows a different panorama. also if you zoom inside (and outside) maybe you will be able to see some constructions that judging by its geometrical shapes rule out any blah blah blah blah meteor impact blah blah blah. Also the rim of the crater. Seems to be a common factor in all major "Craters" on our moon
This one is by the same astronomer. No need of enhancing. Quite bizarre by itself. JAXA pics on the same area seem to be also plain blah blah blah
The image also shows the craters Street (seen here above Tycho), Pictet (left Tycho) Sasserides (below and to the left of Tycho), Lexell (bottom left of the image) , Ball (to the right of the latter) as well as craters Orontius (left Pictet), Huggins (at left and Orontius PETJB on it), Saussure (above Orontius), Proctor (top left image, below the crater Maginus, seen here in part cut on the top edge of the image), Brown (right, a little above the horizontal axis of the image) and finally in Heinsius bottom right in this photo, below and to the left of Wilhelm (crater partially cut off and lying on the curb in the lower right quadrant of image). Moon Medium Resolution C8 & FFC barlow + extension tubes. Webcam PL1-M + Astronomik red filter. Registax treatment.
The acquisition conditions were acceptable or even pretty good at times. Video of 400 raw images, about 100 images were selected for the final image.
Note that the image was inverted to allow easier reading.
Feature Name: Archimedes Photographer/ observer's location: François Emond Date : m/d/yyyy; Time: H:M (UT): 01/10/07 à 02h49 TU Enhanced by Frutty Source: here
I will make an exception as to the non-NASA images title of this thread, but I think it's worth it.
Picture attributed to Space probe Clemetine 1994, depicting Lermor Crater on the Dark side of the Moon. – Enhanced sharpened and colorized by me.
If you zoom in on this image you will find plenty of anomalies. Sculptures, anthropomorphic receptacles, temple like open areas, bridges etc .. Who on earth built those things? What is (was) it's purpose? Who was there before?
It's a shame we are unable to zoom in closer then I am sure we would see some very interesting detail.
From what can be viewed in the image is the type of evidence that suggests there is an active life existence is on the moon and also that they have probably been in residence there since a mass exodus from their home planet to escape an impending disaster of catatrophic proportions.
It's also possible that the evacuees reached this planet many thousands of years ago, probably during the neolithic period.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Excellent enhancements timewarp, goggog and watcher. Here I colorized last one by TW. You will undertsnad why every moon photograph we can lay a hold on is black and white. I see some moonies yawning like oysters in their perplexing lunar daily lifes.
Here is a closeup view that I have enhanced slightly.
Take note of the features that can be seen on the surface. If only the NASA images were of this quality and this image was captured in 1968 - over 40 years ago.
This text below was taken from the webpage.
<< Zond-6 flew around the Moon on November 14, 1968. It carried the AFA-BAM camera with 400 mm objecitve, shooting on 13 × 18 cm frames of isopanchromatic film. A session of 111 frames was performed at a distance of 9290-6843 km, and another session of 58 frames from 2660-2430 km. A crash landing on Earth flattened and broke open the film canister, but 52 photographs were recovered with some degree of laceration and fogging. Only a few fragments of Zond-6 images have been published. >>
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
This is a very interesting image to work on although quite old. I cannot find a hint of 'tampering' on the image as we find on many of the NASA images.
The feature thewatcher has displayed is typical of what can be observed in many other locations on the moon. These circular features are definitely artificial.
Please look carefully right into this image as it contains many built structures. If you are using IE8, use the magnification feature in the bottom right of your browser to make the image larger. If you have a magnifying glass handy, observe the features without enlarging the image. There are also many anthropological shapes to observe.
Researching this image and many of the other lunar images I get the impression that the Moon is definitely occupied by an intelligemnt existence.
Could the current inhabitants be the descendants of people from Mars?
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Crap.. sensitive screen.. Hadnt finished post or adjusting my infamous typos.. If you look at other craters in image, there are classic shadows withing their classic bowl shapes. The crater Ive pointed out shows no sign of shadow within the bowl, intead a structure occupies the central region. The crater is shallow and flat with an almost perfectly defined circular rim.
Image below showing standard crater shadows and anomalous crater in situe. It stands out like a sore thiumb.
Most of the lunar images we have to view are released by NASA/JPL.
Here is an image from a completely different source - the ex-Soviet Zond-6 mission.
Take note of the surface detail.
Without changing the size of the image I used a powerful magnifier to observe the detail and was surprised at the clarity.
I believe this image gives a good idea of what is really on the Moon.
Have a look and see how many of the features are recognizable to you.
It would be appreciated if other members could improve this image or download the original to 'clean' it in an effort to show the image with even better quality.
My theory is that many of these astronomers have seen anomalies with their telescopes and decide they wont say anything, since it would ruin their career or status.
What they do do however, is to publish the best photos in case anyone wants proof and needs another angle. Just maybe somone else will pick it up from their photos?
PREVIOUS IMAGE TURNED 180 DEGS. nOTICE THE CENTRAL FEATURE. iT'S PROBABLY THE SOURCE OF THE LIGHT EMANATING FROM THE CRATER ON A FULL MOON. aLSO IT APPEARS TO BE ARTIFICIAL IN NATURE.
Judging by the texture of the terrain, it could point to be upholstered in lichen and moss. This is my view of the color of this region should that be the case.
This is pre-Apollo data by one of the most outstanding brits astronomers and partner Wilkins.
Only downside: The photographs don’t have an identification. That is unless one can make out a view from previous studies, you won’t be able to determine the coordinates or even familiar names.
However astounding features are visible, which account for the ongoing secrecy about our mysterious satellite.
Sometimes I used to get this effect when the photos were flipped top-to-bottom and as soon as I did this, they looked OK again. This was with the Lunar Orbiter photographs though, where the tif image is at a different orientation to the jpg photos. I dont know if this works with his photos.
What does everyone think about the black smudges and dome idea?
On Top the original Image by Christian Viladrich . On the Bottom I have inversed it (like a phot negative).
Notice the one below is the one we4 are used to.
Should Christian’s Viladrich not be a negative, then that would mean Tycho crater is not a crater but a Mountain, and we would have been being misled for years.
Tycho and Copernicus are two of the most astounding alien facilities. Here is the elevation model of Tycho. Notice many a tycho picture contradict each other as for it’s surroundings. Also notice in a Full visible Moon’s face photograph always Tycho and Copernicus are glowing bright.
I want to start another thread because these are non-NASA images of the Moon that are really very good. I think I read somewhere that they were taken through a telescope that is cooled. I do not know whether these have been taken by a recognised observatory or whether this guy just owns a good telescope. Anyway...I just though you would like to see it.
I want you all to look at this photograph. It is of Tycho crater and is of very good resolution pictures taken through a telescope from earth.
In this one, down at the bottom left hand corner, there are what look like hexagonal 'panes' as if they belong to a dome structure placed over the crater. Also look along the bottom edge too. Throughout the image there are streaks going southwest to northeast and I wonder if we are looking through this clear dome onto the surface of the Moon?
In other areas of this picture, it looks as if the black parts have been added because sometime there are structures which are not so black, showing through. In some areas the black appears to be underneath these lighter structures too. I find it difficult to believe (because this picture has not come from Nasa) that these are added into the picture after it was taken, so what exactly is going on here?
I realise that astronomers stack photographs together to get a better view, so it may be as a result of this 'stacking' process or some other processing done after the shots were taken.