Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: Rover pictures are aerial photographs discussion


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1910
Date:
Rover pictures are aerial photographs discussion
Permalink  
 


fruitnut1

1296597?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1284595200&Signature=fVqi5ufWgQIR%2Fcv%2B6i2fgPnEGjE%3D&1281715149

Veteran Member
redstar.gif

Posts: 549
Date: Fri Sep 3 09:08 2010

Reply Quote More indicator.png
Edit Post
Delete Post
Printer Friendly

Ban IP
Report Spam

The evidence of Mars rovers beeing a fraud are displayed in an image not too far below in this thread. Take your time, study it, compare, visualize.

I am glad you are an open minded person.

Maybe an image is worth a thousand words.

See the comet Halley thread

(edited by qmantoo to insert link point to Halleys comet thread as picture duplicated there)


-- Frutty

__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


-- Edited by Chandre on Saturday 4th of September 2010 01:40:30 PM

__________________


 



Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1910
Date:
Permalink  
 

papadipongo
Veteran Member
redstar.gif

Posts: 148
Date: Fri Sep 3 08:56 2010

Reply Quote More indicator.png
Edit Post
Delete Post
Printer Friendly

Ban IP
Report Spam

1- Agree with you : probably their program is to let see the anomalies to people open minded who dig in images like us.
To prepare population to a further contact, to drain funds with the perspective of a technological jump, to experiment the reaction of the pepole to alien evidences ?
one of them or a combination of all these targets could be quite realistic.

2- Agree
3- Agree, the reports from some ex astronauts are shocking
4-Maybe, i'm oriented to think that planets like earth are a sort of plant, whatever an organic lifeform without self-coscience, just slightly in disagree with you here.
5-Agree 90%, only i think we ve been on Moon.

6- Would be intrested to hear what do u think that celestial bodies are in reality : do u think they can be like entities with an intelligence ?

7-maybe, of course i believe there could be races totally different from us like for example energetic creatures like spirits.

at the end we have ideas closer than they can appear.

anyway we cannot have evidences of what u say about the images, that many of them would be panoramics doctored to seem to be taken from little rover veichles.
the only evidences that we have is the anomalies we can spot, and if they are real or the result of an hoax ran by the space agancies, it really doesnt make difference.
They are whatever anomalies, that's what we are lookin for here.
This is the only point of ur ideas i must disagree.

 




-- Edited by Chandre on Saturday 4th of September 2010 01:41:01 PM

__________________


 



Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1910
Date:
Permalink  
 

fruitnut1

1296597?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1284595200&Signature=fVqi5ufWgQIR%2Fcv%2B6i2fgPnEGjE%3D&1281715149

Veteran Member
redstar.gif

Posts: 553
Date: Thu Sep 2 13:15 2010
Reply Quote More indicator.png
Edit Post
Delete Post
Printer Friendly

Ban IP
Report Spam

No papadipongo, you are not seeing things. I have said it before and I take this chance to reiterate. These photographs are aerial photographs taken by satellites, and published after heavy tampering maneuvers are applied onto them, with the intention of conning the viewer into beieving the photos are taken by little rovers on Mars, and obfuscating what otherwise we could see as clear as the light of day.

There is nothing small in what you see in this photograph in particular. In fact according to what I have learnt, martian constructions are gigantic.

As an evidence I am posting the original image accompanied by an enhancement from which I take a sort of sphynx construction (in the middle of a big city around), in order to support my argument, and whgich is invisible in the heavily tampered original.

Anomalies.jpg



-- Frutty




-- Frutty.

__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/
papadipongo
Veteran Member
redstar.gif

Status: Online
Posts: 148
Date: Fri Sep 3 07:44 2010
Reply Quote More indicator.png
Edit Post
Delete Post
Printer Friendly

Ban IP
Report Spam

hi fruit what u said it's intresting

the possibility that "someone" at Nasa or somewhere is modifing Mar's images published is an idea i yet had.
i think it must be considerated as a possibility.

i mean, i thought to this : Nasa images' anomalies coul be related at some sort of program of experiment, those artifacts could be added to create an illusion, but it must be an illusion with a target.
And what can be the target ?
It's an experiment to see and evaluate the reaction of the public to evidences of alien life ?
It's an hoax to drain funds from the government, giving illusion of ancient technologies waiting on Mars to be recovered, just to substantially steal the public money throught the illusion of the prospective of a technological progress ?
It's just a program to start to create coscience of the alien phenomenon and its reality, for a better impact of a the larger part of world's population to futher contacts we will have ?

i donno, but i'm pretty sure there is no point to modify images inserting anomalies just to cover other anomalies.
it doesn't ve sense to me, but i 'd change idea maybe, the elements aren't enough for now.

as of now i dont believe that the image in object in this thread is in reality a panoramic taken from an high altitude, so showing in reality mountains and not stones, but i'd change idea...see below.


for what concern the dimension of the anomalies, i agree with you that generally the proportion seems to be gigantic, more when ships and buildings are the objects.
Anyway, another typical anomaly are the generally so called "debris".
mechanical debris are spread evrywhere, there are dozens of them spotted here or in the net, and i dont think that even a skeptic could criticize them and debunk in an easy way.
I think the obejct im pointing to are debris, mechanical pieces of ancient machinery, as all the other anomalies i've spotted since i started this hobby.
At the end, even if gigantic, the artifacts can be easily composed by many parts, and it's perfectly logic that in the case of a war or a catastrophe mecanical debris would be spread evrywhere.
think to this and tell me what think about.



fruitnut1

1296597?AWSAccessKeyId=1XXJBWHKN0QBQS6TGPG2&Expires=1284595200&Signature=fVqi5ufWgQIR%2Fcv%2B6i2fgPnEGjE%3D&1281715149

Veteran Member
redstar.gif

Posts: 553
Date: Fri Sep 3 08:15 2010
Reply Quote More indicator.png
Edit Post
Delete Post
Printer Friendly

Ban IP
Report Spam

Of course papadipongo this is my take on the issue.

1- For me it's a fact that close up takes of celestial bodies are all obfuscated so the viewers cannot see the real picture but can see enough to be marveled and wondered.

2- I think science has met it's limit. Ok. we are able to launch probes and take photographs of distant planets. That's superb. But that's as far as it goes. If they showed what is behind naked,  that would be a shock after all these years of astronomy data manipulation

3- Images from the moon showed more anomalies and more wonders in Atlas dated as far back as 1895, than Atlas now, even though our technology is superior,  and some researchers as Percibal Lowell who studied the red planet all of his life and who published books about the intelligent beings and constructions on Mars have been discredited by a new wave of a worldwide secrecy agenda. Pre Apollo Astronomers (mostly British), who took pictures of the moon with its beings practically showing in front of our eyes, are long forgotten, though their work you can arrive at ... on the internet ;)

4- It's my belief ancient cultures knew the real meaning of everything. How? why ? I don’t know. Today thanks to science and technology we think we have understood the cosmos -> wrong. Celestial bodies are closer to supernatural beings than dull matter obeying physics' rules.

5- Yes space agencies have a secrecy agenda, with multiple purposes, the rover stories and Moon landings are psyops to keep the belief that everything is under control. Plus keeping the budget flowing in. If man can land in other planets/moons/asteroids, which I think we haven't done so far,  it will be many many many centuries from now. We are still a primitive culture.

6- Asteroids are not what you find in encyclopedias or textbooks or wikipedias, neither are comets, stars nor even the earth when seen as a celestial body.

7- I believe every celestial body is inhabited, by human like creatures or like our animals insects, plants etc … others which we have no familiarity with, whether energy beings or made up of different elements and gone through different evolution paths. (Though not the Darwin's evolution which for me is just another load of baloney)

You see I am totally in the far away variance side of the bell statistic distribution concerning my beliefs. I don't try too hard to convince anyone of anything. But I am surely an outspoken and opinionated person when asked to share what I think

Cheers,

-- Frutty


__________________
Some other alien stuff at http://anomalies.johnpeniel.com/


-- Edited by Chandre on Saturday 4th of September 2010 01:41:55 PM

__________________


 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard