I have spent quite a lot of time analyzing and processing this image and it would appear that NASA has missed many of the features showing in the image. If this was an aerial view taken on this planet I would say that it was an area of habitation.
Many people would discount theory this as far as Mars is concerned as they would say the inhabitants would have to be very small. They would actually be hitting the nail on the head, so to speak, because the beings that live on Mars are very tiny beings. Their small size is probably due to the vastly different atmospheric conditions to what we have here. There's no getting away from it, there are many structures showing in this cropped image and many, many more in the full image.
Two images are shown below which is a crop from the main image. The jpeg compression artefacts have been removed. I have processed the image to show up the detail. The first image shows a major surface feature and the second shows many other interesting surface features and anomalies.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Good evidence you posted here goggog. That picture you refer to is full of evidence, but so much spoiled by NASA for not being able to find much to show. However, we can learn a lot from this picture both about Mars and also how NASA handles scientific evidence.