Alien Anomalies

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

RE: Deceptive reality.

Chandre · Dedicated to the truth

Frutty, try tilting image so that the structures are parallel to the horizon. Its easier for our brains and eyes to process that way and may be easier for newbies to see...

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

I HEAR YOU GUYS i HEAR YOU ... ARROWS POINT TO MEGAMOONIES STRUCTURES. smile

Source http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/photos/13-e/med/as08-13-2229.jpg

-- Reprocessed, blurring image and then resharpening to clear features in adjacent areas.

qmantoo · Teaching the truth

Yes, I realise that this is what has been done... but I dont see anything out of the ordinary that I can identify as an anomaly. This is the point I was making.

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

qmantoo wrote:

Sometimes, even if features are circled, it is not obvious as to what they are - particularly if the image has been processed in some way. As Timewarp points out above, it must confuse new visitors if they cannot immediately see what we are talking about. And...as I said before, I often have difficulty seeing what some other members think are obvious.

c'mon gmantoo, I used the shadow enhancer you programmed based on the same ideas we have been discussing lately. You have a powerful tool in you hands. And you know what I mean . lol smile

qmantoo · Teaching the truth

Sometimes, even if features are circled, it is not obvious as to what they are - particularly if the image has been processed in some way. As Timewarp points out above, it must confuse new visitors if they cannot immediately see what we are talking about. And...as I said before, I often have difficulty seeing what some other members think are obvious.

Timewarp · Dedicated to the truth

qmantoo, you have raised a good point.

If images are posted that either have a poor description or insufficient indicators of what can be seen, how are members and non-members expected to follow the drift of what the poster is trying to explain?

I believe features in an image should either be circled or have arrows applied to indicate the features in question to make recognition easier to observe. It's even possible that a poster may be able to recognize the features where others can only spot them when they are highlighted in some way.

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

GM, as a rule of thumb, they fake shadows to censor those ugly faces that are everywhere on the moon, and that could make our babies wake up in the middle of the night and start crying.

I downloaded the original image and recovered most of the shadows I could. Encircled in orange you'll see the disgusting faces that have caused all these tragedy and cover up of what is found in other planets. In Orange a big Moonie building. Note. The picture is roughly processed to show what I mean. FUrther processing would be required in case that a science mag got interested in uncovering the uncoverable and wanted to publish a decent version of the uncensored image.

Moon .jpg

-- Frutty

qmantoo · Teaching the truth

Fruitnut1 - I feel that it is no good keep 'gifting' us with these 'processed' images if you do not actually say WHAT it shows and WHERE these things are supposed to be.

Each time you post a 'processed' image, I just skip over it because you say 'here is a processed image which shows how fake it all is' and then I know from experience I can never see what it is that you see.

I am not saying there is no benefit in posting these 'processed' images, but I am saying that there are going to be other people as stupid as I am, who cannot 'see' what you are 'seeing' in these processed images without some kind of obvious hint as to where it is.

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

This sketch reveals some fake shadows and adds perspective to what was inteded to be hidden. It looks like another moony complex to me.

Moon .jpg

-- Frutty

Timewarp · Dedicated to the truth

Over the last couple of days, I have carried out a more in-depth study of this particular image and have come to the conclusion that much of what we are seeing on the surface of the Moon is artificial. The surface features showing in the image below have been very cleverly crafted to an intelligent design. I believe this artistic work has been carried out to create the impression that what can be seen on the Moon from this planet is real. The problem is that close, detailed examination of the surface features tells a completely different story.

I have studied the shadows in this image and they are just not adding up. I believe many of the areas showing as black in the image are 'man-made' to an intelligent design and could possibly be lakes and/or waterways. Many anthropological shapes are also highlighted and this type of landscape sculpture is typical of the art-work that can be viewed in some of the images returned from Mars.

In view of the above, the following questions have to be asked.

If the moon is such a desolate place, as the text books lead us to believe, why can so many anthropological shapes be observed in just one image?

Who sculpted the anthropological shapes into the landscape and where could 'people' with that level of intelligence have come from?

And, more importantly, could there be an intelligent presence that is currently living and surviving on, or under, the surface the Moon?

The detailed image is shown below. Please examine carefully.

Lotte · Member

At the left side of the big shadow (crater) the rim is in full sunshine, so you can conclude that it is a steep slope, and higher than the rim at the opposite side of the crater. The high rim casts his shadow over the entire crater. Most interesting to me are the buildings at the most right corner of the picture!

qmantoo · Teaching the truth

Yes, he does think they are normal and he is also saying that we should find out the latitude and longitude and look for other pictures of the same area. If we find these we can then look at the dips and bumps of the topography of the area and see if they are consistent with the shadows presented in this picture.

Timewarp · Dedicated to the truth

Frutty said, "This is not deceptive reality. This is a deceptive montage!"

I'm a little puzzled why Frutty said that.

Do he mean that the image is composed of many separate images or does he mean that additions have been made to the original image?

Anyway, I still have concerns about some of the shadow areas in this image although OBrien seems to think the shadows are perfectly normal for a low sun elevation.

OBrien · Member

Image supporting shadow conclusions of previous post.

Picture 27.png

OBrien · Member

Timewarp wrote:

The large black area is deceptive as no object or land protrusion can be seen to cast such a huge shadow.

The near crater rim casts a shadow on the far inner crater rim; the majority of the crater is in shadow. Yellow lines depict object/shadow placement along the direction of illumination. All the other craters are completely shadowed by their very small rims--the large crater is almost completely shadowed by its rim, although being lumpy and irregular on both the near and far sides, the shadow edge is correspondingly irregular. There is nothing in this image inconsistent with the sun angle shown.

There is no other evidence EXCEPT for the shading of the terrain and the shadows. Well-established methods of mapping terrain use the presence or absence of shading and shadows to detemine landscape topology. Since you claim that no object can cast the shadow, please present your independent evidence of the topology of the area.

Timewarp · Dedicated to the truth

The large black area is deceptive as no object or land protrusion can be seen to cast such a huge shadow.

fruitnut1 · Dedicated to the truth

This is not deceptive reality. This is a deceptive montage!

-- Edited by Chandre on Wednesday 28th of July 2010 06:21:43 AM

Timewarp · Dedicated to the truth

Mr Skipper in his latest report posted an image from the Apollo 8 mission.

Researching some of the images captured on this mission is revealing many things about the lunar terrain that many viewers are missing.

Take a look at the following image and take note of anything that appears unusual.

The image reference is AS-8-13-2229