Not a chance unless I can develop a line in psychic programs or psychic computers!
Just look up AS15-M-1556_MED.png - it is about 12Mb apollo 15 hassleblad I think maybe 70mm. this is the one I got it from anyway. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/metric/revolution/?AS15R35
Not a chance unless I can develop a line in psychic programs or psychic computers!
Just look up AS15-M-1556_MED.png - it is about 12Mb apollo 15 hassleblad I think maybe 70mm. this is the one I got it from anyway. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/metric/revolution/?AS15R35
Thanks to gmantoo we were able to independently deobsfuscate SOME OF the Apollo's 15 imageS.
GM I took your untampered shadowed image and made some shadow enhancing of my own. This is the result, and as you see there is a big whastsit behind ....
gmantoo's shadow revealed
So the Myth that the Apollo 15 photographs are real and they have not been tampered to exclude artificial structures and the true depth of the Moon's terrain is completely and absolutely BUSTED!
However - if you read the blurb at the top of the web page, it says this. Sometimes there is no detail in the black shadows and and it remains black. and this is the problem with your image which I tried and is below.
I also tried the original AS15-M-1556 as I had downloaded it and it produced this which is much better. Although, it still does not show what you want it to show unfortunately.
When images are big ...Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 67108864 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 14880001 bytes) in /home/weifan/public_html/pelicanbill/subdomains/mars/httpdocs/decode_nasamars_shadow.php on line 215
I have added the program to the menu - it is best used with subjects that are closer to the rover as the shadow areas tend to be larger. Feedback welcome.
No Chrispin It came out like that and I did not want to mess with it, completing it with my own ideas, it probably is => square with no info at all ... I would think.
Hi gogoog you always in time! I took a single quadrant from the whole scene you referred us to.
I have good news and bad news for everyone.
Good News
I have found the moonies we were looking for. They dwell inside fake craters, and I am showing you visual evidence and how they look. (well you will have to zoom in for yourself). (ok maybe different colors, different shades but you get the picture)
Bad News
Until an independent source can reach the same conclusion, starting from the original image, nobody will believe it.
GM's algorithm for seeing through shadows is more accurate than mine. So what I did was merge his results with mine. Now guys see if you can see what we saw
OK, well I will say what I see in the top shadow. I see a face looking down towards the bottom right. The bare head has a ridge along it. nose touching ground. deep-set eye/heavy eyebrows. Could be anything though.
Not only the shadow under the rock, all shadows including the dark deep space lol ... When you are done with it I will run my algorithm and compare ... If we have similar results that will be a big step ... for man lol
I will run it on the moon pic and I will probably send you a link to the full picture after I have done it, rather than posting another large pic on this thread.
So what could the shape under the shadow on the rock be then?
This is a new program that I am developing which seems to be working out quite well.
However, there ARE limitations. The image is altered by taking the value of the greyscale pixel and multiplying it - so do not rely on it or post it as 'gospel'. It is only to show what can be extracted from the pixel colours that are there and making them more visible by widening the gap between one grey and the next.
As with all image manipulation, this could potentially show things which are not there but having said that, it may also show things which are there but have been covered over or reduced in brightness.
I decided to use this example as my test.
Mainly because the part of the 'rock' nearest to us is so black, I thought it would be fun to see if I could programmatically reveal something extra.
So, this is what I found. You have to interpret this yourself otherwise I will be placing ideas into your head and you will 'see' something which may not be there. I think you will agree, there is potential for experimentation here.