Here is the same image as above, slightly lightened with some of the features circled.
The image shows a second tiny pyramid (arrowed). This pyramid also appears to be set in a square and is similar to the first pyramid to the right.
There are also some other interesting features, including many anthropomorphous shapes. These shapes are found either on rocks, cliff faces or built structures that have been constructed to look like a head or a face. This is not uncommon for landscape views of Mars.
Some viewers may also recognize the unusual cranial protrusion. This addition to the Martian cranium is seen in a vast amount of their sculptured art-work.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Not at all fruit....I deal with ATS'ers so this ain't nothin bud
But why do you have to totally change the image to make your point.
That is not fare to the rest of the public nor any body on this thread.
I am merely making a point that it is nothing more than some sand here...
If you have to manipulate the image in such a drastic way ( which I admire your technique to see anomalies, but not to disprove the original ) to show that I and the OP are wrong (I say nothing...he says pyramid) is not very professional.
Lets try to stick with what the thread states...and go from there...nothing more...nothing less.
__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
Fruit....I'm sorry but.....If you have to change the image and zoom in to such a feat to show...ahhemm....little people....well....
I understand that the initial find leads to the name....as it could totally change into nothing...or possibly something more.
But CLEARLY....the OP has stated it looks like ( and does) without image manipulation, a pyramid. _________________________________________________________________________________
now on an odd turn...you have changed the image to show something else in the same exact spot....but yet....provide the same theory...that is...LPT.
I can and will argue that it is nothing more than some sand.....without changing the image; and just using plan old logic to figure it out. You've been here as far as seeing thngs in patterns go , but to manipulate the image and then say it is not what the OP has said it was ( or looks like it was- which I agree- it does look like) to validate your poinnt ...is well....going against the grain so to speak.
__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
K.....So you r saying there is a "pyramid" there.......is that right......?
There may be something "more" in the image....but in regards to the "pyramid".....would it be fare to say that you believe that is a genuine, built by something, little pyramid...?
So...in your opinion, referring to the original post, This is.................
If you zoom in you will see there's no longer a tiny pyramid at all, but that's the name it was given in this thread so for familiarity ... What you can see is what I call creeps. They are a common factor in all spirit pics.
K.....So you r saying there is a "pyramid" there.......is that right......?
There may be something "more" in the image....but in regards to the "pyramid".....would it be fare to say that you believe that is a genuine, built by something, little pyramid...?
The tiny pyramid is part of a more complex object which is part of a more complex object and so on and so forth. That's my theory of the fractal world.
While I do acknowledge that it does in fact "look like" a pyramid;
I'm gonna haf 2 go with just an anomaly in the sand...why...
1) I'm against the little people theory ( As explained in previous posts ).
2)If you do believe in the little people theory....Then Please somebody get a standard scale and stick to it. All the little cities and little people and little "structures" NEVER coincide as far as scale goes....And that is a big problem...unless each inhabitant varies in size by about 200-400%
3)There is no color variation amongst the rest of the sand...which means either they are building out of sand....or....its just sand.
OF course....IMHO
__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.
Looking closely at the cluster of objects, which I feel are definitely buildings of some description, there appears to be a track or 'road' leading away from the objects towards whatever it is higher up the hill. The dome seems to be made of a metallic material which means it could be a lookout tower as evidence has been found in the area of various types of weapons. Is it possible that Spirit may have travelled into a war zone? Of course, my thinking on this is pure speculation and should not be taken seriously until more valid evidence becomes available.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Timewarp thank you for the welcome. I keep an open mind and a tiny race of Martians is not out of the question. If this is so then God help them because we are close to going there in force.
navajojimmy, Welcome to the forum and thank you for your recent posts.
Yes, there are some structures on the side of the hill in the distance, although the distance of them from the camera lens is deceiving. Your observation of what appears to be a metallic spherical dome atop another structure is well noted. I have noticed these objects but did not highlight them as the pyramid and adjacent stones were the subject of interest at the time.
I believe there is a tiny race of people existing on the planet so any structures related to them will also be very tiny. They are between 3 and 10mm in height. Exploring the images for indications of small built structures is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Also the metalic dome appears to me to be perched atop a multi story building. I am kind of a causual observer so I do not know the scale. So am I looking at a building the size of what is typical here on earth or a miniture scaled down version? I know some have a theory there may be very small inhabitants on Mars. Of course this could be all in the eye of the observer(me).
I'm sorry ICEMAN, but I see no 'forgeries' in this image nor any of the other images of this view. This particular image is the genuine article.
To prove this I have provided an anaglyph of the view. If the image handlers were to 'forge' anything on one image they would have to do it on all the other images associated with the scene.
__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
This is a very interesting thing (little) I'm not so sure about it because the criteria we have is what NASA has fooled with the image and insert stones that are probably no relation to the size of the original specimen as always. To support this do I label items that are completely out of line as part of the image and not in any consistent what one should get used to the phenomena in nature.
Whilst investigating the image shown below I came across a tiny pyramid set in a square. The object is located and highlighted to the lower right of the image with an ellipse.
To the left of the pyramid is a group of much larger stones which may possibly be the remnants of a statue from an ancient time. There also seems to be a structure of some description on top of the larger stone of the group.