Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Post Info TOPIC: In Search of Little People...


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
RE: In Search of Little People...
Permalink  
 


goggog, you'll find nothing of interest in the anaglyph. You have to work on the high resolution .tiff or jpeg to really analyze what is on the surface of this particular rock.

__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

To be sure about the subject of the image size you need to know how the picture is handled, for example. reduced depth of the image is the visible scene in some cases made microscopic to hide that failed with other methods and more can be enumerated in this context.

Microscopic_Animal_Enthusiasts_(o)_large.jpg

In many cases we are seeing something that does not fit into the environment. It is rocks all over and nothing that is reminiscent of nothing else but waste and empty This is the picture that NASA wants you to see. And now it is a time to makeup and never use NASA phrases to enplane what you see because they are tools of your enemy.

barnhart_05.jpg

 



__________________


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1884
Date:
Permalink  
 

Timewarp wrote:


Link to video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmU_0cA0_RI

 




Sol_B1961_A_1P302273325RSLA5ARP2_4275A0.jpg



__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1099
Date:
Permalink  
 

gmantoo, when investigating an image properly you have to filter out the compression artifacts first otherwise the content and detail you wish to view can become very confusing.

On the question of 'little people' being present on Mars, I have posted some information on this topic in other threads.

As a matter of interest, take a close look at my avitar to the left. What do you see?

Do you see any jpeg compression artifacts?

This image is a sample from an image I processed of what is on the surface of the large rock discovered by Opportunity in August 2009 called "Block Island".

There is obviously more on Mars than just sand and rocks.

During 2009, NASA revealed that vast quantities of methane had been found in the martian atmosphere. In December 2009, I sent a script and question to the NASA astrobiologist, David Morrison. He answers questions from the general public about planetary and science-related subjects. Up to the present time no reply has been received from the astrobiologist but the script and question are still available to be viewed on the NASA 'Ask an Astrobiologist' website. I only became aware of this when searching for some scientific data in relation to the Phoenix image lg_7851. 

Is it possible that in the video (link shown below) that I may have suggested a valid reason why there are vast quantities of methane present in the martian atmosphere and NASA may possibly be investigating the content shown in the video?

I can only assume that either Mr. Morrison does not have a direct answer to my question or that something may be showing in the video that he is very reluctant to confirm.

On the other hand, the reason why he has not answered could be down to the fact that on the 'Ask an Astrobiologist' website he firmly states that there is no intelligent life on Mars and to change his scientific view and admit that evidence has been produced to the contrary would be a contradiction to his original statement.

My script and the associated question that I asked can be found here.

http://astrobiology.nasa.gov/ask-an-astrobiologist/question/?id=9219

Link to video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmU_0cA0_RI



__________________

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

Arthur Schopenhauer



Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1911
Date:
Permalink  
 

Yes, as I said it is such a large enlargement that it is more likely that they are image compression artifacts. At least, there ARE a lot of those in the picture, but the other stuff....?

My only question that remains is - what about these similar structures that we see in other photos of Mars? The balls/spheres, the donuts, etc.

If they are all artifacts then we are all totally barking up the wrong tree. If they are not, then there is some "validity" in the photos where they appear.

__________________


 



Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1911
Date:
Permalink  
 

Anything is possible till more evidence is collected....
What an excellent comment - I totally agree, but I do not see you posting any evidence to support your ideas. How about you surprise us?

__________________


 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 209
Date:
Permalink  
 

gmaanto don't get discourged from what i'm going to say, and if u believe ti strongly keep to develop ur theory searching for other elements.
but in honesty these anomalies are only pixel compression artifacts.

the we cannot know if someone at nasa or somewhere else has images with a better resolution shoiwing the little people.
of course, there is the possibility of little sized creatures, but at the moment the evidences seems to bring in an opposite direction in my opinion.

i mean, many of the most shocking finds are of huge structures with proportions absolutley incredible for us.
recently someone posted an intresting topic with a disc hammered into the ground in vertical position, of around 2 km of diameter.
this isn't a structure sized for humas-size beings or microscopical beings, but for "giants".
every architecture spotted, as many artifacts resembling veichles spotted, are of giant proportions.

then i agree with u upon the spheres : a lot of them, with different size, sometime like a tennis ball are more little, sometime of the size of a stone and sometimes very big.
we can say that spheres, metallic and rocky, are a characterisitc anomaly of the surface of mars.
few days ago here someone ( i'm sorry i've short memory for the names ) spotted a metallic sphere, clearly and without doubt.
this is an aspect very curious and that we are sure of, we must focus on the more clear elements, elsewhere we risk to waste our energy hunting a doubt.

but i repeat, don't give it up if u believe it, something of good will come out when there is the curiosity and the love for the investigation and the knowledge.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

I am no photography expert by anymeans....
judging by what we are looking at....its hard to say its anything but artifacts.....

Sorry but that image just doesn't do it for me...and prbly the rest of the public as well.

I see nothing more than irregularities....and nothing more....
It seems only you eagle eyes have this ability to spot things in these images...

Sadly, I do not have this ability.

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1911
Date:
Permalink  
 

The question is - are these artifacts in all the photos that we have been looking at? I dont think so, and it is strange to see the same shapes duplicated here. This leads me to believe that there is some kind of intelligence behind thee shapes and that they are fulfilling some purpose.

There are balls/spheres here and square shapes, are these artifacts too? It is quite possible at such a high resolution, I suppose, but that means that they are also artifacts in other photos which they are clearly not. So where does that leave us? As far as I can see , it leaves us with the possibility that there are very small towns and cities and this is what nasa are hiding when they do not give us the raw (or even just jpg compressed) microscopic imager images.

__________________


 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 256
Date:
Permalink  
 

what is the scale on this..?

Are we talking about germ size here?....?

Anything is possible till more evidence is collected....

__________________
Get your facts first....Then you can distort them all you please.


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 679
Date:
Permalink  
 

Why are you so convinced of the size and aspect ratio. I as experienced photographer makes me fully aware of what the camera lens can deceived awareness in this respect.
I know that on Mars are a figure (human being) four feet in height bud a microscopic “human beings” have I not seen on Mars, except maybe a flower fairy ....



__________________


Teaching the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1911
Date:
Permalink  
 

...And I mean very very little people.

Prior to today, I was sceptical about the whole thing, but it just goes to show that we need to keep an open mind.

Now this is highly enlarged, so I might be barking up the wrong gum tree again or just barking mad, who knows. However, I have found what looks at first sight to be more than just compression artifacts. Faces in the clouds? See what you all think.

Original picture here

I think I know why we have not had any evidence of tiny aliens and that is because the microscopic imager pictures are also tampered with. Now, this might be as a result of normal jpeg compression, but I do not think so.

Having examined a few microscopic imager pictures, there does seem to be some regular patterns underneath the compression artifacts. For example I have identified 3 types of structure at least in the following picture which I admit, is highly enlarged. This means that anyone could say that these are normal jpg compression artifacts.

However, these are structures we have all seen in other Mars photographs, such as ball/spheres(red arrows) donuts, square structures of various types(yellow arrows). There is even a '+' shaped structure (green arrow) which we would probably identify with a hospital but that is putting our interpretation onto something which is not ours. Nevertheless, there are a number of regular-shaped structures in a photograph which should be of a common rock with maybe lichen or blueberries covering it.

rockface1.jpg

__________________


 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard