"Facts highlighted in the work of marine toxicologist and Exxon Valdez survivor, Dr. Riki Ott, published in her Huffington Post article, BP's Promise Versus What BP Really Means: Some Insights on Making People Hole (Whole) and Just Us (Justice) in the Gulf, leave little mystery about who is responsible for the ongoing Gulf mega-disater, including the aerial spraying of lethal dispersants not only over water, but on human populated areas - and falsehoods about limits of the sprayed poisons.
Only a tiny amount of the Corexit poison is lethal. Without intense mass detoxification, up to 40 million Gulf Region people could already be poisoned. Shortly before his untimely death, oil Guru Matt Simmons had predicted that mass evacuation was the sole way to prevent a heavy human death toll.
Ott writes:
"It turns out that dispersants are not -- and never were -- explicitly banned within three miles of the coast or in less than ten meters of water (the "nearshore environment") as USCG, EPA, NOAA, and other federal officials have staunchly maintained. The Coast Guard and states can approve dispersant use in nearshore environment on a case-by-case basis across the Gulf if the incident commander decides the toxic chemicals were "expected to prevent or minimize substantial threat to the public health or welfare, or to mitigate or prevent environmental damage."
In fact, neither of policies for Region IV (Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida) or Region VI (Louisiana) have any areas where dispersant use is expressly banned. Louisiana even has an expedited process for requests to spray dispersants in the nearshore environment."
Marine biologist and toxicologist Dr. Chris Pincetich warned in a Project Gulf Impact interview several weeks after Gulf operatives began spraying Corexit, that birds would be a mechanism for carrying the poison to people in other parts of the nation and the world. (Censored Gulf news: Dr. Pincetich on Intel Hub Radio tonight (video), Dupré, Examiner, July 10, 2010; also see Gulf continual gusher, Synthia, arsenic, plague and dead birds (video))
Can American public halt military assault against it?
As the Gulf Operation health and ecological impacts intensify, the public needs to pressure their respective states to file for Freedom of Information Act documentation according to Ott who writes:
"The Louisiana Bayoukeeper has requested that the State of Louisiana provide documentation of dispersant spraying and experimental release of bio-engineered bacteria in nearshore areas under the Freedom of Information Act. Organizations in Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida would be wise to do the same. This information is critical for understanding health and ecological impacts as well as economic harm." (Emphasis added)
Ott's article reconfirms that the military's objective in the Gulf operation is not a human one, and that military has been conducting a huge Gulf Psychological Operation (PSYOP) on an unwitting and pacified public . Consistent with the petrochemical-industrial-complex acts in other nations, unlike what the public has been led to believe, the U.S. Coast Guard's job has not been to assess impacts on the ecosystem or human health.
The U.S. military has headed the Gulf operation, formerly through Coast Guard commandant, Retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, the "National Incident Commander."
Using the repeatedly used term, "BP oil spill," part of the military Psychological Operation, (PSYOP) Allen had said in October that he "transferred oversight of the BP oil spill response" to another military officer, Rear Admiral Paul Zukunft at the Unified Area Commander, in New Orleans. (Admiral Allen Steps Down as Gulf Oil Spill Response Commander, Environment News Service, October 1, 2010)
"Allen also served as commander of the Coast Guard's Atlantic forces in their response to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. (Environment News Service)
During Mr. Jeff Rense's interview with Dr. Tom Termotto on Rense Radio Network, January 19, using the term "treasonous," Dr. Tom explained the necessity of holding accountable leaders of the Gulf operation's continued catastrophic impact on planet, humans and all life.
Since Allen is no longer immune from legal means to hold him accountable, he was named by Dr,. Termotto in the radio interview.
Allen now claims that if he had it to do over again, "on Day One of the disaster he would have taken control of the air space" according to NOLA.com.
Allen is now a senior fellow with the RAND Corporation. .... and so on.....