Timewarp,  To you I do not disturb,If I will spread here the finds?

http://www.lyle.org/~markoff/processed/2P276928870EFFAY00P2275L234567M1.JPG

Do a site analysis of site B2 and then do a search for items from this site and you will see that there are hundreds of pictures taken of this site through all of the cameras. Click (on the search program results page) on the image of the black square/white spot to get a list of the photoids for posting here or elsewhere.

Here is another image showing something I spotted on the anomaly. In this image the feature looks like a 'cupola', or something similar, that would be found on a fortified construction. In the first images I posted the feature cannot be seen but this could be that the view was captured by the left-hand camera.

Could the feature possibly be part of the anomaly or is it part of the lanscape? The image shown below was captured by the right-hand camera?

I have also circled in black some other interesting surface anomalies which you may find of interest.

If you are unable to view the anaglyphs here is a normal image of the close view.

check also:

Spirit :: Panoramic Camera :: Sol 1898
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/spirit_p1898.html

Well done ICEMAN, a good observation.

It would appear a number of anomalies are showing in this image.

I've been looking at the black shapes on, or close, to the one you spotted. One shape is to the left of it and the other is on top-centre of it.

Over to the far left there are two other small anomalies close together. They appear to be mushroom shaped. Zoom in and they can be spotted on the terrain in the lower section of the main image.

Is this too much or what?

taking a second look there seems to be something kicking up dust further back than the petrified wood...

ICEMAN,

Thanks for posting the images.

When I first spotted the anomaly I thought it looked like either a tank or some form of fortification. I like the large view you have produced.

Thanks to everyone who posted a comment.

The first image that I posted above is the original as downloaded from the MER image gallery. The subsequent images were processed to improve the clarity and edge difinition. None of the images are scanned paper copies. Xenon feels that tampering may have taken place. In my opinion I can find any evidence of this.

The anomaly itself is interesting due to its shape. Is the anomaly a natural rock formation or does it show signs of artificiality? The natural rocks surrounding the anomaly are not similar in any way. Therefore, if it is artificial, has it been constructed to an intelligent design? The possibility of this should not be dismissed as there is evidence that vast tiny-sized civilizations are inhabiting the planet. Many may feel that this is wild speculation, but visual evidence is available to show that this is more than just a possibility.

My own personal view is that this particular anomaly is artificial. If the shape of it is due to glacial erosion, I feel similar shapes should be observed in other images that were captured in the immediate area, but none are to be seen.

What I see is a road way with 3 vehicles traveling, or abandoned on this road. The bottom far right I see 1 vehicle (partially blocked lower part of vehicle) below the observable road the 2nd vehicle (fully visible) bottom left of center and the 3rd vehicle (just the top of the vehicle visible) bottom far left.

 

Iceman wrote:

Please thing, look ,have spunk, take a risk be something more thane a scared mature.
"The “motor” has similar angle and location as outboard motor on boat"

Stop

marsrocks,

What? not staring at individual sentences”


Stop looking for Mercedes Benz - start looking for outboard motors? read what I wrote as one piece not as words with no underlying meaning

????? see here do you nip your one tail

here are you a bit cracked and suddenly not learning a thing

You need to understand what I'm telling you not staring at individual sentences, the whole thing read what I wrote as one piece not as words with no underlying meaning, so don't say WHAT! If you do not understand or want not to understand or maybe you run a way as something touch serious point.

See! I tray to bring people to understanding on what I'm doing and saying bun there are people here who are not serving sensible propose as for doing research on data from Mars and suddenly not learning a thing, just stubborn self fending individuals.

You maybe do not see it bud AA is fainting-out

Hi OSD,
This can be something for soil processing or used on snow or water. The “motor” has similar angle and location as outboard motor on boat and other floating things.

 Timewarp wrote,

The reason why I research rock formations is because of the features that may be on the rocks, like finding an unusual shape or what may appear to be a carving of some description and then determining what is being observed. 

 

It's fine someone has some clear vision and can explain how he want his work look to others, I respect that.

The question is if something looks like not being stone bud something else is. If is is not a stone way it is looking like a stone and how is it made that way. This means if something looks like a stone bud are in fact something else how are you going to use it and bring your knowledge to others. If you just find something you think is something and do not have a guts or others do not allow you to comment intellectual on it are you nothing more than a collector or just throwing stones around you.

 

Nobody seams to be growing or evolve anything. No knowledge about the planet Mars or the Moon ate taking place. People here are just rumbling on the same track back and forth. Nobody (with very few exception) are learning a thing. My conclusion about this: (how data are explained) do serve interest of NASA perfectly. Please open your eyes, or gets mad no matter what. This forum has no overall vision if I leave out kicking up some dust.

Iceman.
Ps.

marsrocks wrote,

I agree with Xenon.  That object seems most likely a layered rock.  But interestingly, it is a single rock and not two or more rocks, as I had thought more likely:

It's just one thing I want to say about that, look! “that stone” That “rock” has very complex and perfect symmetrical formations and also trigonometric ally accuracy if you think this is a stone I tell: you you are on a wrong track.

When are you gonna use your brain, you are not that stupid are you?
Please thing, look ,have spunk, take a risk be something more thane a scared mature.

As a comparison, this is what a bad (defective sensor) pixel looks like - same scene:

ICEMAN wrote, "Why are you all looking for and show some stones looking like this and than, way not looking for something that counts."

The reason why I research rock formations is because of the features that may be on the rocks, like finding an unusual shape or what may appear to be a carving of some description and then determining what is being observed. 

Some members may disagree with me, but there is plenty of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic evidence showing on rocks in many locations, but none of the shapes are "earth-sized". The majority are millimeters in size, so one has to look right into an image to research what is really there rather than just looking at the overall image. Finding a rock with rectilinear charateristics may not be a rock at all. Some images, especially from the rovers, are amazingly clear which allows for easier identification of features discovered on rocks and the terrain.  

I believe researching this kind of evidence has the same importance as researching the geophysical or atmospheric characteristics. For example, if there is visual evidence to show the planet is inhabited, are there any features in the images that would indicate what the species or 'people' may look like?

ICEMAN, If this type of evidence does not count, please let us know, in your estimation, what kind of evidence does?

Very interesting image Timewarp, will look at it in 3D.

Hi Timewarp

I take it you are referring to the central block in the 3rd image?

The rock does look unusual with its raised platform, but IMHO I feel it could just be eroded sedimentary rock not unlike Brimham rocks or other wind eroded rocks

The image is poor quality and it seems to of have a lot of tampering, so all may not be as it seems.

Interesting find Timewarp