Alien Anomalies

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Mars Balancing Stones Revisited


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 432
Date:
RE: Mars Balancing Stones Revisited
Permalink  
 


L2L5L7 color combination with no hue adjustment and no sharpening:







__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 432
Date:
Permalink  
 









__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 399
Date:
Permalink  
 

lol, no it don't, tsad!

but it does look like the same place. ???!!!

@ellement115

i caught that too but unless mars creatures have some funky skeletal structure, i am still out on that.

dam sure looks like a lizard and crawling out from under a rock!

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 34
Date:
Permalink  
 

this spot is really fishy...

and that balancing rock doesnt look the same in both pics confuse

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:
Permalink  
 

Is it just me or does it look like this EEL looking rock has moved?
I've added a few reference lines to show my point.

mars1

mars2



__________________



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:
Permalink  
 

What do you make of this from your sol 513 image ?

Something crawling from under rock



__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

doney, I have merged your original post into this as we need to discuss this under one thread.....

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
RE: A fine example of tampering! Can anyone explain this?
Permalink  
 


Humanoid wrote:

Nope. Mars Balancing Stones is sol 464. Doney's image is sol 513

Doney, can you please post the whole image and outline the whereabouts of anomalies. Thanks

-- Edited by Humanoid on Saturday 3rd of April 2010 11:30:31 PM


I was going to let this slide but i want to come back on this. I mentioned in my post that the rock was shot at a different angle.  You stated you didnt recognize it due to the different angle?

You based your reply on SOL numbers?? You didnt even check to see what I was talking about?  Chandre took it upon herself to just see what im talking about.

Sorry I was no where near a computer to punch up the image but im sure you must remember it as you corrected my name of the thread.

Just found you reply a little strange..NOPE?

Sorry humanoid but just bothered me a lot.  But im sure you just had an off day. Thanks for looking in anyways.





 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'll just say for the record... this site aint flat. Its 3D. The tampering has (Amazingly) taken out the structures that are 3d. Chandre.. your 1st Avatar (i think) was an example of the 3d objects tampered out.. They just didnt complete the job on that area.

Top section of Lions head missing.

I remember reading Harrys post .. It cryptically points to Every line and crack has a purpose. Not natural.

Its not just the tampering causing confusion.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
Permalink  
 

Thanks guys.. i knew it just had no computer to hand.. There is a level of tampering thst goes way beyond what is currently known.. harry touched on it but it was too far fetched to understand at the time. Every thing is moving.. Slowly.. and catalog numbers are not to be relied upon. If theyre tampering with images then theyre tampering with registrations of images. This is a very serious problem. there is no way anyone should trust the sol numbers , their order, time date ref etc..

Now the mystery is why the hell did they change the sequence or that little old robot has been going nowhere and there is a 3rd robot out there.

I have seen other sequences of these locations and the ground is moving. I just cant relocate the images. Dam!!

Cheers Chandre and also Humanoid. Humanoid believe it or not your cold unbiased view, though frank, helps push those and challenge what we see. great work guys.. Really frustrated, need to get back to my machine ASAP..

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 399
Date:
Permalink  
 

that's the same rock?


can't wrap my head around that.






__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 335
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chandre, yes I can now say with confidence it is indeed the same stone. Positions of surrounding rocks check out perfectly, even though viewed from different angles. Guess what misled me before was the stone's visual appearance resulting from the viewing angles from different sols.

__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Humanoid, I understand what you are saying but if you compare the two images you have to agree that they are of the same area. If not, the mystery deepens as that would mean that there are two almost identical sites within 25 metres of each other and if that is true than this is a discovery of ENORMOUS significance.....

2P167556899EFFA9HEP2280L5M1.jpg

gmantoos programme gives the following info ;

My image above http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/p/464/2P167556899EFFA9HEP2280L5M1.JPG

This photograph 2P167556899EFFA9HEP2280L5M1 is version 1 of a photograph produced for M - MIPL (OPGS) at JPL on Sat, 23 Apr 2005 19:33 (Sol 443).
It was taken with the PANCAM, through the Left camera, using a 535nm (20nm bandpass) (green) filter on the Mars Rover Spirit.

It is a full frame EDR picture which is raw, is NOT liniarised, and is NOT thumbnail sized

The picture was taken at site number A9 on drive number HE, and the command sequence number P2280 to take the picture was instructed by PMA & Remote Sensing instr. (Pancam, Navcam, Hazcam, MI, Mini-TES) and belongs to the group 2000 through 2899 - Pancam sequences

Your picture is Sol 513 or 514 so it appears that it is the same site taken from the other side. The site ringed with a question mark in the official map....



-- Edited by Chandre on Sunday 4th of April 2010 02:03:30 PM

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 335
Date:
Permalink  
 

Chandre, the stone seen in doney's image from sol 513 is the one below from sol 514 where it can be observed up close. That stone is completely different to the one from sol 464 (Balancing Stones thread)


LINK

-- Edited by Humanoid on Sunday 4th of April 2010 12:10:36 PM

__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

The first image is Mars Balancing Stones from a different angle so the second image is to the right of that.

Humanoid, guess they must have come back for a second look later.... I have a series of the Balancing Stones taken on Sol 514 which shows this angle.

I am working on this at the moment, in the meantime I will leave you with a Spirit Traverse map downloaded from the official web-site.

Two interesting things here, the aereal view is blurred unlike the other maps and two areas are circled with a question mark (by them not me). Strangely the one is our Balancing Stones area (as far as I can tell) and the other is another area I am looking at... I am not ready to post yet so I will leave the map as a teaser wink

MERA_A517_3_br.jpg



-- Edited by Chandre on Sunday 4th of April 2010 06:23:04 AM

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 37
Date:
Permalink  
 

I'm posting two photos with different perspectives.  These are some of the best examples of tampering.
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911839EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG
15 Full.jpg
15 Full-B.jpg


__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 335
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nope. Mars Balancing Stones is sol 464. Doney's image is sol 513

Doney, can you please post the whole image and outline the whereabouts of anomalies. Thanks

-- Edited by Humanoid on Saturday 3rd of April 2010 11:30:31 PM

__________________


Dedicated to the truth

Status: Offline
Posts: 1217
Date:
Permalink  
 

Already looking at Mars Balancing Stones 2 thread with another image so will work on this as well. Thanks for heads up, will post SP link in thread...

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
Permalink  
 

Sorry Done.. Great find.. This an image where I started to believe in aliens..

Im not using superior software.. Just an amazing friend and colleague whose knowledge of tampering and image structure is next to none. ( im using photoshop)..

Have fun.. Look around central stones (main full image) and look for thread called standing stones.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
Permalink  
 

Hi doney... had a look.. I think i'll leave it to others as this has a more interesting story for me .

Chandre, Humanoid and Xenon... When you get a chance have a look at the link supplied Above.. (i'll put it below too)
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG

Lucky I have a photographic memory... I think.. ok, I know for sure this is the same location that you guys and Harry had ur meeting of the minds (shall we say). Just shot at a different angle... I think i can pull up the glyphs or their location..

Doney you stumbled on very important ground. This is one of the locations where I first found Harrys work.. I wont put the link to thread I'll leave that to admins , if they want too.

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 37
Date:
Permalink  
 

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/n/513/2N171911803EFFAAL4P0606R0M1.JPG
I also noticed the diamond pattern to the right of, what appears to be, the "15".  I noticed some of you have superior software that can extract more detail.  Please give this a shot.
Tampering.jpg

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard