It never ceases to amaze me how small these ancient coins really are! If the penny Chandre shows is 19mm in diameter then those coins must be 3-4mm in diameter, a ratio of 1/4 roughly! So if the average human male height is 1.70m then these guys must have been no taller than 35-40cm or 16in. You'd need tiny hands to handle such small coins after all. Below are a couple videos of little creatures/gnomes I've found on YouTube. Do not know if footage is authentic or the work of pranksters but nonetheless interesting.
-- Edited by Humanoid on Friday 29th of January 2010 04:43:51 PM
After my Coin Report I have spent a lot of time thinking about who/what would be able to handle an object this size. We are hopelessly too big, so I imagine it would be something with an opposible thumb on a hand that would be about ten times smaller than us. If Humanoid is 2m tall than that would make the Martian about 200cm tall. Thats just over knee height. It fits with a lot of what we are seeing........
The crazy thing is that if they were on Mars, than they must have been on Earth as well (we have the same size coins here !) and the ancient Celtic myths of the Leprechauns, Pixies and Fairies would fit in very well with a knee-high or smaller size person. It also make sense that if they did exist here in about 3000BC and at the time of the Phoenicians than it makes sense that smaller coins which were exact copies of the larger ones would have been minted to allow for trade with the other races. It also follows than that they may not have been from Earth but may have traded here using these specially minted coins. A dangerous train of thought........
About… . Successful trophy. Sometimes it seems to me that on Mars the living beings are found in the energy level different from the Earth. Therefore [ikhnee] manifestation for us, through our tracers they are not intelligible. Because our instruments of [rashchitany] for the fixation of our physical peace.
Hi, there are a variety of sized martians.. Some very small and move very very quickly. Large ones like in my avatar (discovered by Harry). The scale problem is difficult but there is clear proof of the very small and large . The surface seems to be covered in anomalies but i do believe these are entrances to their subterranean abodes. Ive also located some cliff based Ets. I feel theyre very opportunistic and due to the harsh conditions spend very little time in the open unshielded.
Hey guys, the lilliputian theory is one I'm still seriously pondering. There is some bizarre stuff down there. I believe the rovers are capable of raising their panoramic cameras on masts to get higher perspective views, including taking pictures of itself.
Qmantoo, maybe you are right about the scale bud so many Mars Rover pictures looks to be taken from much higher angles than the Rover is possible to do. I think in many cases the Rover is just put into pictures taken from ca. 900 miters above the ground. If you examine the angle to the rocks next to the Rower and the angle to rocks more fare they seams to be to much alike as if the picture where taken from much higher altitude.
iceman - The problem is that we do not know the scale, but it is unlikely this house thing with garden is much bigger than 3-5 foot across and the one over on the right, the long dark one, cannot be more than 15-20 feet long. I really do not see how these things could be houses big enough for people-sized beings to fit inside them, unless we are looking at the original Gullivers travells mini-men. I could be mistaken though...
I know that people argue that any scientist who 'discovers' something would get this prize or that prize and would most likely get funding in the future by being a 'celebrity scientist'.
However my thinking is that these scientists do not want to risk the ridicule from their peers and shame for believing in such things as we are discovering every day. They would rather tow the line and keep their mouth shut and keep the money coming in for their research. No-one is privately funded these days, because there are not enough really rich scientists, so they have to rely on grants and public money for research. Most scientists have families and are not going to jeapodise their family when it comes to their work.
Companies who supply research grants are not interested in other things that the scientists might find along the way if it is not in the research remit. I am sure that if you are a scientist, you learn pretty early in your career that you must keep your mind focused on the research you are being paid to do and ignore everything else you may happen to find.
There probably is not enough time to go back and investigate that 'interesting' anomaly that you found while working for X.
Sooner or later somebody will confront us with a problem of logic regarding our argumentations. We should be prepared. "How come , it is possible to build up theories depending on images and datas presented by the space agencies of the world, whilst the same moment you accuse these agencies of partly faking or cosmetically changing these datas and images ? Which tools do you use to separate the faked ones from the surviving "honest" ones and which proof are you be able to show, that your tools to indentify them, do function correctly ? "
To be not misunderstood: There is a big thing under the carpet, I have no doubt about that. Simple logic says, the universe has to be full of life. Another simple logic says: Why our high payed elitist scientist are not be able to detect it ? Not be able to detect it ? With all the specialized equipement they have detected it. No doubt about. Going on and on, digging a whole, oh sorry, nothing, another one - oh sorry nothing , another satellite into orbit, 200 exoplanets discovered ?, oh sorry, no habitable orbit, etc. I have always been interested in astronomy. Standard model till not that long ago preached from the pulpits of the universities went like this: The creation of a planetary system needs very special conditions, so many physical factors have to come together, it is unlikely that there are many planets in the universe, maybe our ones are the only ones. ( Same chain of argumentation has been used to silence supporters of the Life-is common-in-the-universe-theory.) By the way we have nine/ eight planets in our own solar system. Not one , nine/eight, depending if you call Pluto a planet. Even this did not make them wonder. They preached their absolutely wrong "opinion" into the ears of generations of students and forced them to accept it, otherwise they would not have gotten their diplome. It goes more worse. Students have to prefer the theorie of their professor, that means reading about diverging opinions / theories has to be hidden. Sometimes even knowing about their existence has to be hidden to avoid conflicts. Do these brains carry really educated and multiorientated minds, as we expect them , leaving university and going into high places of our society, where important decisions have to be made? Professors do preach the knowledge of yesterday. The knowledge of today is created in the laboratories and in the think tanks. Ever heard about a professor fired `cause he was not be able to follow the progress of science? Never heard about a such a case. Another extensive chapter, I won`t touch now, is the shameless cooperation between universities and the military-industrial complex. This chapter deserves some really special expressions....
I reckon most of these pictures have strange things in them that the NASA boys wanted to examine more closely and we just get the tail ends of these investigations. To them of course, the pictures would be a lot better so they probably already know what these objects are by now.
sometimes i think they just let us try to figure it out for them.
so they let things through and since we have our own debunkers/advocates on a huge scale,
and probably faster than them, they just follow along.
what kind of distance is this from the camera? It can only be 20-30 yards at most surely? That would make these things about 2-4 feet long perhaps. Not very big but it may be some wreckage from something?
I reckon most of these pictures have strange things in them that the NASA boys wanted to examine more closely and we just get the tail ends of these investigations. To them of course, the pictures would be a lot better so they probably already know what these objects are by now.