Alien Anomalies

nogoodendinsight, in answer to your thoughts about Lunar crater erosion, the mainstream theory of why impact debris has disappeared, is because of regular sized and micro meteor impacts breaking up the surface over hundreds of millions of years , the solar wind then stripped off gases and smaller particles into space.

My concern with this argument is where has all the debris gone that was blown off into space?

Hi Humanoid

A question pops up: if these were craters, where is the ejecta? On a lifeless, weatherless piece of rock with no wind, water, etc., how could this material disappear? Or is there erosion on the moon? At scales where the lander is visible, detail should be much better. When you visit thelivingmoon.com you can see pictures with real detail which look nothing like this Apollo 12 landing site at all. I am convinced that we have not been shown many pics of the REAL moon. Compare your picture with these here:
http://thelivingmoon.com/47john_lear/02files/Steve_Austin_Anomalies_02.html,
something does not seem to be right at all. The images show surface detail, whereas the picture with the "lander" shows almost no detail at all. On the other hand, the domelets or craters, whatever they may be, have a weird resemblance to the bubbles that come to the surface when plaster of Paris is solidifying and you used too much water in the mix. I sometimes build dioramas and this problem must be corrected to get an authentic look at the smaller scales. Building a scale model of Taurus-Littrow in 1/72 is no big challenge at all for me, so how could it be difficult for Nasa? As seen with the "life-feed" of the LCROSS impact, they rely heavily on models. If you google a detailed picture of that south polar "crater", the detail they left in the few places not covered by obfuscation is highly orthometric and unexplainable, while detail in the TV pics was as poor as usual.
I guess we will have to pool our piggy banks for a trip to Luna so we can verify these things ourselves.

Hi everybody! Just my two cents: check the shadows of the anomalies against the shadows of all the domelets. They should be on the opposite side. I'm not saying it's photoshopped because NASA's obfuscation software has several shortcomings, illogical shadows being one of them. This looks like a plaster of Paris model to me. Take a close look at José Escamilla's Moon Rising and you will know what I mean. The moon is not the lifeless rock they would like us to believe. Despite Nasa's efforts to darken each and every color image from the Clementine mission it is plainly evident that somebody owes us one very big explanation. Water vapour clouds stretching for 120 square MILES were witnessed on the moon by several independent observatories around the world in 1971. Not talking about it doesn't make it disappear. An expert who is not willing to take into account ALL the data available in my book is no expert at all. Most NASA imagery is and will continue to be extremely tampered stuff. Keeping reality and obfuscation apart is difficult but essential. And yes, there are a lot of disinfo shills and hoaxers around, some of whom already have made a name for themselves and yes, we are not in Kansas anymore, Dorothy!

Hi Harry
We have picked up a number of anomalies on the Apollo images. I am sure you will visit the other posts when you have time. I'm working on the Tycho Crater images at the moment trying to seperate the terraced structures from the tampering, its hard though as I don't have a technical background but I can see the outlines 'through' it. I think you will be amazed at what members of this forum can see through the tampering  

I agree with you that everywhere you look on the Moon especially in craters you will see structures. I have a theory on that which I am sure you will eventually get to on the site. 

BUT, not limited to Mars and the Moon. Take a look at Steins Asteroid too. Not now though, I think your brain is already on overload and needs a rest (we may need to pick it in the future so I have selfish motives)

The Apollo 12 anomalies I posted a few weeks ago included some elevated mechanical-looking objects I referred to as 'hinges'. I was hoping to see if I could view them from the air to see how many of them there were and if there was a pattern. Unfortunately, the image is NASaTY so no chance of that !

Humanoid, can you see the flag ? I'm trying to orientate myself so I can look at the 'hinges' anomaly I posted but I can't see it.