Thank you Timewarp, even without the enhancements the tower is still there, but now the anomalies on the crater wall look more like pipes to me, I also have to wonder what the object is just below right of the crater..... Good find timewarp
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"
The the anomaly circled red looks as though it has been added as you can clearly see the squared outline surrounding it, the tower structure next to it is interesting as it has the look of the huge towers found by other researchers, pity the original image is not available for comparison.
__________________
"Creating a fiction when stating a fact destroys the credibility of the truth one are trying to convey"
In the image above there is a large feature to the lower right that looks like a crater - but is this feature really a crater?
On closer inspection it would seem to be artificial and made to appear from an aerial viewpoint as having a crater shape, the large black area being a shadow.
Within the confines of this feature, shown above in a red ellipse, are some definite structural shapes. The tall objects can be seen clearly in this view.
Here is a close up view of the feature and some of the anomalous objects in the immediate area.
I apologise for the image quality but the original is a digitized forty-year-old analogue film capture.
Do you have any views or comments as to what can be observed in the image?
Here is an interesting area to check out. To show the location I have placed a red rectangle on the Laney view.
The second image is a close view and shows what may be a matrix of some description.
I have placed a yellow ellipse around some of the object material that would appear to be structures of some description.
To me, the shape or shapes contained within each ellipse would seem to be artificial with some even appearing to be built structures.
Some of the shapes have similar form as other object shapes seen in other images of the lunar surface.
In fact, when the images are worked on to improve the clarity it would appear that there is a great deal of artificial object material to be observed.
Maybe David Icke was right by saying that the moon is a giant hollowed-out spacecraft.
Personally, I wouldn't go that far but I do suspect that there is life activity on and just under the surface of the moon as there are many tell-tale signs in some of the Apollo images to confirm that there is more on the surface than just rocks and dust.
I have had a look at the Laney image and concur that the object seems to have been blurred out for some reason. However, I have managed to sharpen up the same image and have increased the colour saturation by 100%. I have placed a yellow rectangle where I think the anomalous object should be.
Whilst viewing it would be worth zooming in to examine the surface detail in the upper and lower parts of the image. I have included a very close view of the object. Note within the ellipse there are also some tall structures. What these are I do not know but can only speculate that they may be chimney stacks or water towers. This is the same view where I found what appeared to be a power station and switching matrix details of which appear on this forum in another thread.
Hey Timewarp, I had a look at this pic off of Keith Laney's site.>>> http://www.keithlaney.net/ApolloOrbitalimages/AS17/H/AS17-151-23260.jpg I usually find pretty clear shots there. I thought you might like to see that the anomaly you cropped below cannot be seen. Maybe it got blurred out. I tried to make the crop as close to yours as possible. I think it should be were I circled.
Here's a neat one from the same photo.
Where did the original idea come from that no one could possibly be on the moon?
Well, it seems to me hat there is no correlation of the "shadows" to the surrounding areas. If there is a shadow, then there must a corresponding "sun blocker"! And that I do not see for most of this "shadowing".
Also, it seems that if these were for the most part really shadows, then the sunlight would just about have to be coming from all directions at the same time, which is impossible!
-- Edited by rdunk on Monday 11th of August 2014 09:02:25 PM
