Here is another view from the Apollo 12 series.
Two images are shown.
The first is the original resized to 1000 pixels wide.
The second is a crop that I have shadow-enhanced¬† by 2% to bring out the surface detail.
From the closeup view it would appear that there¬†has been¬†a lot of intelligent activity going on. There are many features showing in the enhanced view.¬†Maybe we should¬†start calling¬†the moon a small planet rather than treating it as a satellite to this planet!¬†
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Timewarp wrote:Do you see any unusual features in the second image?¬†
Do you see any unusual features in the second image?
Maybe we should call the moon a 'planet' as was slipped out¬†by Neil Armstrong when he made his commemorative speech at the White House. He was also perfectly correct when he said 'there are things to see beyond belief' and there certainly are many things to see in the Apollo images that are definitely¬†beyond belief, but the objects¬†are real. The camera has captured the real truth of what is on the surface.
We've heard nothing from the space institutions about what is contained in the Apollo images, so why are they keeping¬†quiet about what is really there?
The first image shown below is the main rotated image and the area of interest is rectangled. The second image is the section contained within the rectangle. With this image¬†I have increased the color saturation by 200% which has helped to identify the structures on the surface.
You will also probably notice that there are many faces showing. This gives us a clue as to where these 'people'¬†came from. From previous research, I have determined that this particular race of extraterrestrials integrate their own facial likeness into many of their structures and statues.
As some members and visitors prefer to view¬†an image without highlights, here is¬†a plain view of the image shown above.
Xenon, I would be interested to view your inverted image of this scene.
Posted below is the same view with the brightness increased slightly which produces a twilight view.
I have circled some of the more prominent features.
The finding of these structural features raises some very important questions.
We are told that there is practically no atmosphere on the moon but these¬†structures have been built¬†on the surface. That means that the race of¬†'people'¬†who built them did so either in spacesuits or they have adapted to the lunar conditions.
Here is another view taken from the same master image.
The location of the building complex is on the outer rim of the large crater which is immediately below the very bright 'false crater'. Notice the two 'bridges'¬†between the¬†building complex to the¬†outer slope¬†of the crater. (Right-hand red arrow).
Timewarp wrote:The reference for these images is:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS12/51/7568.jpgI was beginning to wonder what¬†all the¬†white dots were so decided to further enhance the image. Reducing the brightness to a lower level confirmed my¬†previous thoughts¬†that the image¬†may have been captured during a twighlight or night-time period. The image crop shown below¬†is located to the lower right of¬†the rotated main image.Could¬†it possibly be that what is showing in the image¬†may be one of the reasons why¬†people from this planet have not returned to the lunar surface?¬†
The reference for these images is:
I was beginning to wonder what¬†all the¬†white dots were so decided to further enhance the image. Reducing the brightness to a lower level confirmed my¬†previous thoughts¬†that the image¬†may have been captured during a twighlight or night-time period. The image crop shown below¬†is located to the lower right of¬†the rotated main image.
Could¬†it possibly be that what is showing in the image¬†may be one of the reasons why¬†people from this planet have not returned to the lunar surface?
This image and its anomalies become much more interesting when you invert the colours, sadly my PC will not let me upload images at the moment, but the inverted image does shows many anomalies that are worth looking into.
The image shown below is the same view as the one shown above. In this view I have arrowed some of the major surface features. Some of the features¬†are more prominent than others.
Note the very long feature arrowed in red¬†which extends from the base of the false crater and¬†rises up¬†and turns to skirt the rim. Could this possibly be a large pipe or duct or even a long row of structures?
The features in the image tells us that if there is still not an extraterrestrial¬†presence on the lunar surface, at one time it was¬†a hive of intelligent activity. This¬†is confirmed¬†by the number of structures that can be observed in the image. I have shown some of these structures arrowed in yellow. Take note of the 'doughnut-shaped'¬†structures that¬†have been observed¬†in other images.
javigd, this image is a very good find.
I have selected the¬†false crater¬†and the surrouding area¬†for further analysis. I have increased the contrast and brightness and have also slightly shadow-enhanced the image (3%).
If after viewing the image you¬†feel that¬†you are seeing things, you are not.
Look very closely as there are many structures showing in the image, some more prominent than others. This begs the following question.
Who¬†could possibly be¬†on the moon and more importantly,¬†how long have they been there?
This image is from apollo 12
imageImage Collection: 70mm HasselbladMission: 12Magazine: 51Magazine Letter: RLatitude / Longitude: 9 ¬į S / 66.5 ¬į EFilm Type: SO-368Film Width: 70 mmFilm Color: colorIf we rotate the image for a better view and remove shine and give a little more contrastget this
7805.jpg (–ł–∑–ĺ–Ī—Ä–į–∂–Ķ–Ĺ–ł–Ķ ¬ęJPEG¬Ľ, 3900x3900 –Ņ–ł–ļ—Ā–Ķ–Ľ–ĺ–≤)
The Mars Rover Photo Utility Site and Search
Hi HumanoidFrustrating isn't it, as far as I would imagine the Hi-res should be a much better quality but that is definitely not the case.It was actually the 'machine' image that clearly indicates this better ImageAS12-47-7014. The detail in the lo-res is much clearer than in the hi-res. In fact the hi-res has some serious tampering to make the anomaly appear as though it is part of the astronauts boot prints. Now this is absolutely ridiculous for the simple reason that the boots they were wearing could not possibly make those imprints (unless someone else with different boots was there as well). I'm no forensic scientist but I do watch CSI and a certain sole can only make a certain print. Below is an image of the boot soles of the boots used on all the Apollo missions¬†and an image of the prints these made on the moon. Compare these with the smaller, rounded prints of the tampering and VOILA you have a 'smoking gun'Astronaut Bean with replica of his boot sole he uses in his artwork. Apollo Boot imprint on lunar dustAn image of lots of prints and the bootSole of a boot from Apollo 17 missionI even have an x-ray of the bootsMy point....nowhere in these images does the boot taper in in the same way as the one Mr Bean is holding up ! The boot design that was apparantly used on all of the Apollo Missions was a simple elongated oval shape with 9 ridges.Below are a comparision of the two 'machine' images. Images taken from here http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/images12.htmlLow res imageHi-res image
I invite you to zoom in and look more closely at the supposed prints in the Hi-res and then look at the examples above and you will see my point (I hope)...
Hi Chandre,Here I will try to prove that both files, yours from the source you supplied and mine, downloadable from the link I supplied are almost same, speaking in terms of file size and the fact that I was able to match visual evidence in both, making them appear almost identical. Now I should note that I had to "tamper with" my photo only and I didn't touch yours. I of course have no way of knowing why those same images, from different sources appear different visually, as well as I have no idea which one isn't the airbrushed original. Perhaps both had been tampered with, but by applying different techniques, or the way they were scanned from film.¬†Anyway, what I wanted to show is that both photos have near same resolution.
First off I will show again my photo as seen originally:
Below is "tampered" version of above image:Next is your original. Compare it with the one above:Below I have zoomed in on "middle hinge"(as highlighted by you)¬†from your original above:And then same feature from "tampered" version. Note below crop appears a bit more pixelated than¬†above, this is due to my¬†airbrushing of¬†my¬†original twice which degraded overall quality a bit:¬†I'm not that good with Photoshop at all, nor do I use it for image tampering, but it was fairly easy to do what I show here and it took me about 15-20 mins. Just imagine what the secrecy types with their super fast computers could do¬†with incoming imagery though...¬† ¬† ¬†
Hi everyoneI posted some comments on the Mars Anomaly Research page regarding a post that Dave had made. It was an anomaly on†an Apollo 12 image. I am including some of it again below†if you have not yet seen it as I am really confused and could use some feedback.I have†googled and I see that Enterprise Mission and many other sites have queried the validity of this mission and I have some questions myself. Please bear with me as I am going to post the images that I replied to Dave and then a new image for discussion.All these images can be found at http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/images12.htmlThere are obvious anomalies in the first image below. I have ringed some anomalies on the ground that look suspiciously like hinges that could be holding a transparant sheet. They are visible in most of the images if you play around with the contrast etc.Image number AS12-47-7016I have also ringed some reflections in the sky. I then re-worked the images and isolated and enlarged the brightest reflection and I appear to see a face in a space helmet reflected in the transparant surface. If this is true, why is there a transparant surface there, is it a staged photo shoot or is Richard Hoagland right and there are glass structures ? I cannot say but I am SURE that there is a reflective, transparant surface in this image and lights and the photographer are captured in it. I am including a copy of the face I believe most closely resembles this reflection for your viewing.I then started to see if I could find anything else, there is another image that has reflections but I cannot work it any clearer than the one above. The number isAS12-47-7014. While I was working it I found something that may excite Xiriux and Papa. It is just under and to the left of†where the flag is planted†and if Bean and Conrad did not see it they must have been blind ! Please tell me I am not going mad or imagining what I believe to be a partially exposed machine of some sort !Image AS12-47-7014
The next anomaly is a closer view of one hinge (there seems to be at least 3) in images AS12-47-7016 and AS12-47-7018It is clearly elevated above the ground and is casting a very interesting shadow.I look forward to any feedback.